Skip to content

Halo

Fail

Buyers convert on only 1.3% of searches, so Halo is a Fail.

Flapen Score
48
48 / 100
Top 40% of 2,976 Grocery niches · +2 vs the category median of 46
Market size
£161K/yr231K searches / yr
90-day growth
-6.7%search demand this quarter
Competition
54%top-5 click share · 12 brands · 134 sellers

Flapen Score

Halo against its category

The dotted line is the Grocery average. Past it, Halo is stronger. Inside it, weaker.

48Fail
Big MarketTrendingHigh ConversionOpen MarketLow ReturnsPrice rangeAvg priceNo Dominant BrandLow Review BarrierQuality Gap
This niche Category average

Market

The Halo market on Amazon at a glance

Shoppers on Amazon United Kingdom searched for Halo 231K times last year and spent an estimated £161K. The top 5 brands take 82% of clicks. Flapen scores it 48 out of 100, a Fail.

01 · Demand

1.3% of searches ended in a purchase last week.

Shoppers searched for this 231K times in the last 12 months. That counts every search on Amazon United Kingdom for this niche's terms. In the latest week, 1.3% of those searches ended in a purchase. Searches in the last 90 days moved -6.7% against the 90 days before. Searches, conversion and average price together put the market at an estimated £161K a year.

Searches, last 12 months
231K
Growth, 90 days vs prior 90
-6.7%
Conversion, latest week
1.3%
Market size, estimated
£161Ka year
Top search term
halo224K searches a year

02 · Price

A sale here is worth £53.95.

Listings sell for £53.95 on average, from £2.42 to £271.43. Amazon reports units sold in ranges. This niche sold 2K to 3K a year. The average listing sells 0 to 100 of them. At £53.95 that is £0 to £5K a year per listing.

Average price
£53.95inside the $15 to $100 sweet spot
Price range
£2.42–£271.43
Amazon United Kingdom median price
£12.12across 27,606 niches
Units sold a year
2K–3K
Units per listing a year
0–100
Revenue per listing a year
£0–£5K
Returns
0.5%of orders · Amazon United Kingdom median 0.6%

03 · Entry bar

The bar here is low.

67% of listings pay for placement with sponsored ads. 86% ship with Prime. On an average day, 14.8% of listings are out of stock. The average listing ranks #544 within Frozen. It carries 428 reviews at 4.37 stars, so a new listing needs social proof before a better product.

Sponsored listings
67%
Prime listings
86%
Out of stock, average day
14.8%
Average rank
#544in Frozen
Average rating
4.37 starsAmazon United Kingdom average 4.36 stars
Average reviews
428per listing
Listings tracked
21

04 · Newcomers

Amazon counts 1 of last year's 3 launches as successful.

3 products launched here in the last 12 months. Amazon counts 1 of them as successful launches, new products that hit its first-year sales bar. The brands on the shelf have sold for 37 months on average, so the names here are settling in.

Launched, last 12 months
3
Successful launches
1Amazon's first-year sales bar
Average brand age
37 months

Products

Top Halo products & what they sell for

Every tracked product: its share of the shelf, its reviews, and its price.

Competition

Competition: brands, sellers & click share

The top 5 products take 54% of clicks. Leaders hold, but buyers still shop past them.

£0£8K£16K£24K£32K1101001K10K Review Count Sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

Brands

12 falling

Sellers

134

Top-5 brand share

82%

Top 20: 100%

Top-5 click share

54%

Top 20: 99%

Open market

12%

  • Halo45%
  • Artibetter12%
  • Halo Top10%
  • Menkind8%
  • mantic7%
  • Gel Blaster6%
  • Open — no brand owns it (6 brands, 12%)

Demand

Halo search demand

Weekly searches over the year, seasonality beneath. Pick a range.

6K4KSpike '26DecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Peak months: Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0× · 8 of 12 months tracked

Reviews and returns

What reviews say buyers love and hate about Halo

What buyers praise, what they complain about and why they send it back, from the reviews.

Complain

Weight Heavy13%−0.03

at times can feel a bit heavy

Too heavy

The vacuum is a bit heavy

Quality-Overall13%+0.48

Cheap looking

the quality is average -

CANT JUDGE THE QUALITY AS NEW FROM BOX AFTER FULL CHARGE THE BRISTLES DIDNT ROTATE

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%−0.07

Not as advertised

Not as good as the advertising

It didn't and so I guess is not as advertised

Durability8%−0.05

Very cheap and tacky looking - broke almost immediately

Recently the rotating brush on the main head stopped working which is probably an easy issue to remedy

Only had ot 5 months

Value For Money6%+0.83

Poor value for money

but really not worth the price paid

Only a little liquid is needed so although the price is high

Love

Quality-Overall16%+0.48

Excellent product

Build quality: Solid modern construction

The general build quality of this vacuum is really good

Value For Money12%+0.83

well worth the money

GOOD VALUE FOR MONEY

Good value

Ease Of Cleaning11%+0.57

It cleans very well on tile and wooden floors, picking up dust and dirt easily

I am so pleased with this cleaner its easy to use

Very good cleaner

Weight Light9%+0.65

Very satisfied with my new hoover - reasonably lightweight -

Light weight does a fantastic job well worth the money

it feels lightweight although not the lightest compared to my current cordless vacuum

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%−0.07

Meets every expectation

Better than I expected

it did the job

Return

0.5% Return rate 14% Fixable by listing

Weight Heavy18%▄▄▆▆█▃

at times can feel a bit heavy

Too heavy

The vacuum is a bit heavy

Quality-Overall10%▃█▁▇▅▁

Cheap looking

the quality is average -

CANT JUDGE THE QUALITY AS NEW FROM BOX AFTER FULL CHARGE THE BRISTLES DIDNT ROTATE

Functionality-Overall9%▁█▇▁▃▃
Charging8%▁▁▆▃▄█

now wont charge

Too heavy to use with the battery charger being the main problem

Size-Overall7%▄▁▁▆▄█

FAQ

Common Halo questions

Answered from the same tracked data.