Skip to content
53

floss for permanent retainer

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (17.9% search→purchase), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 93Growth 31Conversion 99Competition 7Returns 98Price range 52Avg price 72Brand share 0Review moat 20Quality gap 63

Conversion

Incredible17.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 5% kills the launch gate

Market size

Great$1.9M

$1.9M/yr · 708K searches

Avg price

Good$14.62

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$3.91–$26.91

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Okay+4.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad13,192.29

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad92%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

According to Flapen's Amazon United States niche tracking, floss for permanent retainer is a $1.9M/yr Amazon United States market (708K searches/yr). The top 5 brands hold 100% of demand. Demand peaks in May–Aug. Verdict: Worth a look — 53/100.

Data updated Jul 14, 2026 · scored weekly · How we score niches

floss for permanent retainer market data

Units sold / yr
125K–150K
avg 15,000–20,000/product
Revenue / yr
$1.8M–$2.2M
units × avg price
Conversion rate
17.9%
Avg BSR
#34
Page quality
0%
Prime
100%
Sponsored
71%
Out of stock
0.0%
Avg brand age
58 months
Avg seller age
139 days

Competition & brand share

The top 5 products capture 92% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

3 falling

Sellers

43

Top-5 brand share

100%

Top 20: 100%

Top-5 click share

92%

Top 20: 100%

Open market

0%

  • Oral-B88%
  • RAZOKO7%
  • Cocolab5%

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +4.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.9×

Top floss for permanent retainer search terms

  • super floss129K/yr
  • threader floss112K/yr
  • superfloss64K/yr
  • oral b super floss63K/yr
  • floss for permanent retainer46K/yr
  • super floss dental floss44K/yr
  • oral b threader floss32K/yr
  • superfloss dental floss33K/yr
  • glide threader floss34K/yr
  • permanent retainer flossers24K/yr
All search terms

Top floss for permanent retainer products on Amazon

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%$279K30%$557K45%$836K60%$1.1M1K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 7 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

What buyers say about floss for permanent retainer

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall21%

“EXCELLENT PRODUCT”

Ease Of Use17%

“Ease of use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“Just what I needed”

Value For Money7%

“Cheap”

Efficiency6%

“Consistently effective”

Oral Hygiene6%

“The Oral Super B Floss Threaded is durable”

Ease Of Cleaning5%

“Great at cleaning”

Tooth Sensitivity4%

“doesnt get stuck in my tooth”

Cleansing3%

“feels like it really does the job cleaning between the teeth”

Durability2%

“durability are outstanding”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall11%

“the quality has recently deteriorated”

Size-Overall10%

“The floss length is too short”

Ease Of Use10%

“Hard to use”

Thickness9%

“the blue part is too thick”

Durability8%

“Falls Apart”

Value For Money8%

“Over priced”

Strength6%

“Too flimsy”

Functionality-Overall5%

“is pretty much non-existent”

Hard Feel4%

“feels extremely coarse”

Stiffness4%

“it's a bit too stiff”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product28%
Functionality-Overall12%
Thickness8%
Ease Of Use8%
Quality-Overall5%
Strength5%
Size-Overall4%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Material Quality3%
Durability2%

Common questions

Is floss for permanent retainer profitable to sell on Amazon United States?
The niche generates $1.9M/yr across 7 tracked products. 90-day search growth is +4.7%. Flapen's verdict: Worth a look (53/100).
How competitive is the floss for permanent retainer niche?
3 brands and 43 sellers compete. The top 5 products take 92% of clicks and top 5 brands hold 100% of demand.
What do buyers complain about in floss for permanent retainer?
Top complaints mined from reviews: Quality-Overall, Size-Overall, Ease Of Use. The return rate is 0.4%.
When does demand for floss for permanent retainer peak?
Demand peaks in May–Aug; the busiest month runs 3.9× the quietest.
What does it cost to enter the floss for permanent retainer niche?
Listings span $3.91–$26.91; the average listing price is $14.62 (sweet spot $15–$100). The average incumbent carries 13,192 reviews — the moat a new listing must climb.