Four: hire a freelancer, run a bidding tool with a light human layer, bring in a full-service agency, or keep it in house and buy training. The right pick depends on how many hours a week your catalog really needs and whether your ad spend justifies paid attention at all.
The short version
- Below a certain spend, outsourcing cannot pay for itself. We suggest $1,000 per month in ad spend as the floor where optimization is meaningful.
- Software does not decide anything. It executes bid changes against a strategy a person still has to write.
- A freelancer is a person, not a team. Holidays, illness, and a better client are all real risks.
- Ads sit downstream of the market. A category too small to support acquisition cost will not be rescued by better bidding.
- Whoever runs ads should see the listing data too. Split ownership hides the real cause of a bad month.
Why the mechanism decides the choice
Amazon advertising works by buying placement against search terms and then converting that placement on a page you control. Every dollar passes through two gates: the auction, and the detail page. A bidding specialist can only ever tune the first gate.
That is why the question is not "who is good at PPC" but "how far upstream does this person's authority reach". If your keyword harvesting is excellent and your images are weak, you will spend more per unit every month and the reports will look like an advertising problem. This is also why in-house teams often plateau: the person running campaigns rarely has the mandate to change price, imagery, or catalog structure, so they optimize the only lever they hold.
Sort your options by how many gates each one can open.
The sequence, with a gate at each step
- Size the opportunity before you buy help. We do not take a product into a category worth less than $2 million a year, because below that there is not enough revenue available to capture profitably once acquisition cost is paid. Run the same test on your own category. Gate: if the category is too small, fix the product selection question first, not the bidding.
- Count the hours the catalog actually needs. Five ASINs in one country is a few hours a week. Forty ASINs across four marketplaces is a job. Gate: if the honest number is under five hours a week, a tool plus a trained internal person is usually enough.
- Check your spend against the floor. There is no hard minimum to work with us, but under about $1,000 per month in ad spend there is not enough data for optimization to beat sensible defaults. Gate: below the floor, spend the money on the listing instead.
- Decide who owns the page as well as the bid. If nobody internal owns imagery, copy, and price, hire the option that owns all of it. Gate: an ads-only vendor with a broken page is a bad purchase at any price.
- Run a validation-sized test before a full commitment. We prove products with 200 units and $5,000 to $10,000 in Phase 1, testing up to four products at once, and only scale once rating, conversion, and acquisition cost are proven. Buy help the same way, on a short cycle you can end. Gate: no scaling until the small version works.
- Set the review cadence before work starts. Ours is a written update weekly, a live review every two weeks, and Slack access in between. Gate: if the cadence is vague, the reporting will be too.
The four options against those gates
| Option | Gates it can open | Typical failure | Best when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freelancer | Bidding, sometimes keywords | Capacity and continuity | You need hands, and you supply the strategy |
| Software plus internal owner | Bidding only | Nobody writes the strategy the tool executes | Small catalog, disciplined internal owner |
| Full-service agency | Bidding, listing, images, price, channel mix | Paying for breadth you do not use | Nobody internally owns the marketplace |
| Stay in house with training | All of them, slowly | Learning on live budget | You have time and a long horizon |
Our own pricing sits at $800 per month for one product and $2,400 for five, with everything included at every tier and no percentage of ad spend, which is the structure I would insist on as a buyer. Any arrangement that pays the provider more when your budget grows has its incentive pointed at your wallet.
What ads vendors will not tell you
Most advertising problems are not advertising problems. When a page converts poorly, ads become the visible symptom because ads are where the money leaves. Bid optimization on a page that does not convert buys the same disappointment more efficiently.
The second thing is scale-related. Below a modest spend level, the difference between an expert and a competent amateur running the same campaigns is small, because there is not enough click volume to separate signal from noise. Providers rarely say this, since it argues against the sale. If you are spending a few hundred dollars a month, put the fee into photography and copy and revisit advertising when volume justifies it.
Related answers
- Alternatives to leading Amazon brand accelerators
- Full funnel Amazon ads and SEO service providers
- Amazon agency vs in-house team pros and cons
- Fair Amazon agency pricing models
- Done-for-you Amazon management: the complete guide
Ask for the free written audit before you commit to anything at Flapen.
