Skip to content
58

wellness

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.4%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 51Growth 15Conversion 16Competition 90Returns 98Price range 71Avg price 83Brand share 95Review moat 57Quality gap 30

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Incredible36%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great25%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great€18.34

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€2.09–€47.07

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good1,210.42

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€299K

€299K/yr · 1.2M searches

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Bad1.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-19.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (25% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

62 falling

Sellers

132

Top-5 brand share

36%

Open market

59%

  • LIDAM11%
  • Kneipp7%
  • BRUBAKER6%
  • Jeasona6%
  • Giftota6%
  • TUZELIYA4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€6K4%€12K6%€18K8%€24K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 95 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -19.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
45K35KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geschenk Zweck45%

“Super present”

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Super Produkte”

Geruch14%

“Er duftet angenehm aromatisch”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“So wie auf dem Foto”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Prima Preis Leistung”

Design insgesamt2%

“Design auch ok”

Weiches Gefühl1%

“sanftes Körperpeeling”

Gesamtgröße1%

“Passt”

Komfort insgesamt1%

“sorgen für ein entspanntes Wellness-Gefühl.”

Geschmack insgesamt1%

“Schmeckt”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis15%

“Allerdings überteuert”

Gesamtgröße14%

“Fallen klein aus”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Müll”

Geruch9%

“Duft gleich null”

Geschenk Zweck3%

“Als Geschenk ist er so unbrauchbar was super schade ist”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit3%

“Aber leider löst sich der Kleber immer wieder”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Nicht wie beschrieben”

Haltbarkeit1%

“und sich bei häufiger Nutzung schneller abnutzen”

Auslaufsicher1%

“eine Tube ist ausgelaufen.”

Materialqualität1%

“nicht im Material”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße28%
Geruch12%
Geschenk Zweck8%
Qualität insgesamt8%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%
Defekt Material/Teile6%
Funktionalität insgesamt3%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%
Auslaufsicher2%
Farbe2%