Skip to content
56

seife

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 75Growth 22Conversion 75Competition 86Returns 100Price range 41Avg price 14Brand share 29Review moat 44Quality gap 30

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Great29%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Market size

Good€839K

€839K/yr · 2.3M searches

Conversion

Great7.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Okay2,119.52

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Okay€0.76–€24.70

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay87%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-6.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Bad€5.17

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (29% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

17 falling

Sellers

79

Top-5 brand share

87%

Open market

10%

  • Jean & Len45%
  • by Amazon23%
  • Sagrotan12%
  • CD5%
  • Palmolive3%
  • Tesori d'Oriente3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (11 brands, 10%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€25K6%€50K9%€76K12%€101K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 73 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -6.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
60K40KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geruch53%

“It has a pleasant scent”

Qualität insgesamt9%

“Super Produkte”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Beste günstige leave in Maske”

Weiches Gefühl3%

“Softie”

Reinigung3%

“cleans my hands well”

Saugfähigkeit2%

“Super tolle Creme, zieht schnell ein und ist super zur Haut”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Produkt wie beschrieben”

Komfort insgesamt2%

“Relaxen und wohlfühlen”

Eignung für Mischhaut2%

“Hautschonend und überzeugende Alternative zu hochpreisigen Seifen”

Eignung für trockene Haut1%

“Super zum Duschen, hautfreundlich, angenehmer natürlicher Geruch”

What buyers complain about

Geruch34%

“Stinkt erbärmlich”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Preislich im Hochsegment”

Auslaufsicher6%

“Undicht”

Feucht/Trocken4%

“Sehr wässrig nicht unbedingt empfehlenswert”

Eignung für trockene Haut2%

“jedoch scheint diese Seife meiner Haut eher zu nützen; andere "normale" Seifen trockneten diese aus.”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“die Qualität fand ich richtig schlecht für den Preis”

Allergien2%

“Allergische Symptome”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“- Die stimmen auch nicht ganz mit der Beschreibung/den Details auf amz überein”

Abgabemechanismus2%

“Inhalt Top, Pumpspender Flop”

Motorleistung1%

“Pumpt nicht”

Top return reasons

Geruch40%
Gesamtgröße20%
Auslaufsicher16%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%
Materialqualität2%
Farbe2%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Defekt Material/Teile1%
Verdünnt/wässrig1%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%