Skip to content
52

armani damen

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 17% of clicks), but weak search conversion (0.9%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 58Growth 24Conversion 12Competition 96Returns 69Price range 40Avg price 95Brand share 29Review moat 43Quality gap 55

Competition

Incredible17%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Incredible€41.40

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Good2.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Good€448K

€448K/yr · 1.1M searches

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay2,173.03

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Okay€6.36–€218.31

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay88%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-1.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (17% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

25 rising

Sellers

248

Top-5 brand share

88%

Open market

11%

  • Emporio Armani50%
  • Armani Exchange22%
  • Armani Beauty13%
  • SwissWell1%
  • Tommy Hilfiger1%
  • ZITY1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (19 brands, 11%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€9K4%€18K6%€27K8%€36K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)3 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 148 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -1.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
50K30KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geruch53%

“Original Duft”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Top Qualität”

Gesamtgröße8%

“Passt”

Komfort insgesamt7%

“Bequem”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Preisleistung super”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Wie bestellt”

Haltbarkeit1%

“Hält fast den ganzenTag und an den Klamotten noch länger”

Materialqualität1%

“Super Material”

Gewicht leicht1%

“Super leichte Shirts”

Schweißresistenz1%

“man schwitzt nicht”

What buyers complain about

Geruch26%

“Duft hält nicht so lange”

Gesamtgröße17%

“Absolut keine Passform”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Qualität war sehr dünn”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Nicht wie abgebildet”

Dicke4%

“Material sehr dünn”

Haltbarkeit4%

“hält aber nicht, was es verspricht.”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“was bei dem Preis einfach nicht passt”

Produktzustand2%

“Gebrauchte T-Shirts in einer nicht versiegelten Schachtel”

Materialqualität2%

“Außerdem fühlt sich das Material – egal ob Leder oder Edelstahlanteil – nicht so hochwertig an, wie man es bei dieser Marke erwarten würde”

Lücke/Loch2%

“Nach kurzer tragezeit sind Löcher drin”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße49%
Geruch6%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%
Breite6%
Materialqualität5%
Länge4%
Qualität insgesamt4%
Dünn2%
Nacken fit2%
Transparenz2%