Skip to content
60

vitrine

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 22% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 73Growth 11Conversion 5Competition 93Returns 79Price range 18Avg price 76Brand share 92Review moat 64Quality gap 77

Competition

Great22%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Great43%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Returns

Great1.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€97.88

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good€809K

€809K/yr · 2.3M searches

Review moat

Good933.97

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Bad€6.86–€471.40

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Bad-29.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (22% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

67 falling

Sellers

78

Top-5 brand share

43%

Open market

52%

  • BROTTAR16%
  • Inter Link9%
  • Lvifur7%
  • dofopo6%
  • GUDEMAY6%
  • FREDEES5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€16K4%€32K6%€49K8%€65K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 120 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -29.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
70K50KSpike '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Montage/Installation24%

“einfache Montage”

Qualität insgesamt18%

“High Quality Case”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“Preis Leistung ok”

Stärke6%

“Super Stabilität”

Design insgesamt5%

“Das Design ist modern”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Erfüllt Zweck”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Speicherkapazität3%

“Ideal zur Aufbewahrung von LEGO”

Sammlungsobjekte2%

“Super Aufbewahrung für Lego Figuren”

Gesamt anzeigen2%

“Sehr schöne Acryl-Displaybox”

What buyers complain about

Montage/Installation18%

“Wir haben es noch nicht zusammengebaut”

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Müll”

Stärke7%

“Instabiel”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“keine 10 € wert”

Gleichgewicht/Stabilität4%

“Instabiel”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Öffnung zu groß”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit3%

“Hält nicht zusammen”

Materialqualität3%

“für meine Zwecke zu klapprig nicht die Materialstärke die ich von anderen Acrylhauben kenne.”

Gewicht schwer3%

“schwer”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung2%

“Fehlende Montag Anleitung”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße46%
Defekt Material/Teile11%
Qualität insgesamt8%
Kratzfestigkeit7%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Montage/Installation3%
Materialqualität3%
Farbe1%
Stärke1%
Funktionalität insgesamt1%