Skip to content
53

trockenblumen

Worth a look

Shows beatable incumbent ratings (4.1★), but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($4.82–$14.99) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 57Growth 17Conversion 31Competition 73Returns 70Price range 0Avg price 28Brand share 70Review moat 82Quality gap 90

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Great356.58

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Good41%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good63%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Returns

Good2.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Good€429K

€429K/yr · 1.9M searches

Conversion

Okay2.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Okay€9.32

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-16.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Bad€4.82–€14.99

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 41% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

27 falling

Sellers

47

Top-5 brand share

63%

Open market

33%

  • LAUMOE40%
  • Heyu-Lotus8%
  • KAOHONG6%
  • Rudis Tiny Goods5%
  • CAwished5%
  • LBINYLING4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€17K8%€34K12%€51K16%€69K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 43 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -16.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
50K30KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt26%

“Super Qualität”

Farbe18%

“natürliche Beige wirkt warm und elegant und passt zu vielen Einrichtungsstilen.”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis13%

“Preis Leistung ok”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt12%

“Wie abgebildet”

Design insgesamt8%

“Sieht sehr stylisch aus”

Geruch5%

“riecht gut”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt super in die Vase”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Sie fallen nicht auseinander”

Geschenk Zweck1%

“wurde super als Geschenk aufgenommen.”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit1%

“Mega praktisch”

What buyers complain about

Geruch30%

“Stinken”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Absolut schlechte Qualität”

Ebenheit8%

“sind flach wie ein Blatt”

Gesamtgröße8%

“Trockenblumen - kleines Blumenarrangement”

Haltbarkeit7%

“Fallen total auseinander, wenn man sie anfasst”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Die Blumen entsprechen nicht der Beschreibung”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Keinen Cent wert”

Materialqualität3%

“Sehr wenig Material”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Somit unbrauchbar”

Feucht/Trocken2%

“Trockenblumen”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße38%
Geruch13%
Qualität insgesamt12%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%
Farbe7%
Ebenheit6%
Haltbarkeit3%
Funktionalität insgesamt2%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%