Skip to content
55

mülleimer ausziehbar

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.8%), but soft demand (-22.3% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 62Growth 14Conversion 16Competition 78Returns 96Price range 93Avg price 94Brand share 38Review moat 63Quality gap 48

Returns

Incredible0.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€48.37

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€12.86–€94.75

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Great37%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Good995.71

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€551K

€551K/yr · 918K searches

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay82%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Bad1.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-22.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (37% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

21 rising

Sellers

68

Top-5 brand share

82%

Open market

15%

  • Hailo36%
  • SONGMICS26%
  • GROHE8%
  • tectake7%
  • EKOTECH5%
  • lovewind3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (15 brands, 15%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€11K4%€22K6%€33K8%€44K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 45 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -22.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
25K15KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt24%

“Quality and sizes”

Gesamtgröße15%

“Passt perfekt”

Montage/Installation10%

“Top, easy zu installieren”

Stärke10%

“Äußerst robust”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit7%

“Easy und smooth”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Sieht so aus wie auf dem Foto”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Preis-Leistung super”

Speicherkapazität4%

“Viel Platz”

Einfache Reinigung3%

“Optimale Mülltrennung für kleinen Haushalt”

Materialqualität2%

“TOP Material”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Unmöglich, keine Qualität, hält nicht, unmoeglich”

Montage/Installation10%

“Montage unmöglich”

Gesamtgröße8%

“Deckel passt nicht ganz drauf”

Haltbarkeit8%

“aber nichts hält ewig”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Beschreibung unterirdisch schlecht”

Stärke4%

“Nicht so stabil ist wieder schon defekt”

Montage4%

“Billig, schlechte Befestigung, keine Kaufempfehlung”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Unseriös + teuer”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Artikel beschädigt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Unbrauchbar”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße77%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt2%
Montage/Installation2%
Funktionalität insgesamt2%
Montage1%
Mechanismus probleme1%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%
Behälterkapazität1%