Skip to content
68

gelber sack ständer

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 71Growth 24Conversion 42Competition 75Returns 95Price range 79Avg price 88Brand share 89Review moat 61Quality gap 80

Returns

Great1.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great46%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Avg price

Great€20.18

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Great€6.84–€47.18

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Great40%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Market size

Good€766K

€766K/yr · 1.1M searches

Review moat

Good1,079.4

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Okay3.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-1.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (40% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

34 falling

Sellers

102

Top-5 brand share

46%

Open market

48%

  • efluky12%
  • DOKRVLOQ10%
  • KUEFA9%
  • Novaliv8%
  • Spetebo7%
  • Vireon6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€23K6%€46K9%€69K12%€92K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 47 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -1.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt18%

“Super Produkt”

Stärke16%

“robust und einfach”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit9%

“Schnellt mit einer Hand geöffnet”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Wie auf den Fotos”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Preisleistung OK”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Passt”

Montage/Installation6%

“praktisch, einfache Montage,”

Design insgesamt5%

“Hochwertiges Design”

Speicherkapazität3%

“Ein 120 Liter Sack ist perfect”

Einfache Reinigung2%

“lässt sich aber prima feucht abwischen.”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt19%

“Produzierter Müll”

Stärke11%

“Fragile und billig”

Gesamtgröße10%

“Öffnung zu groß”

Montage/Installation7%

“etwas fummelig beim Aufbau”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Keine 2 euro wert”

Gleichgewicht/Stabilität4%

“Wacklig, billig Finger weg”

Haltbarkeit4%

“Fällt immer wieder auseinander”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Unhandlich”

Design insgesamt2%

“Fehlkonstruktion”

Materialqualität2%

“Das Material wirkt billig und instabil”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße34%
Defekt Material/Teile22%
Qualität insgesamt7%
Materialqualität5%
Montage/Installation4%
Funktionalität insgesamt3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Rahmenqualität2%
Montage2%
Stärke2%