Skip to content
56

thripse bekämpfung

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 48Growth 52Conversion 95Competition 35Returns 99Price range 12Avg price 40Brand share 30Review moat 41Quality gap 89

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible12.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Good+22.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Okay€260K

€260K/yr · 190K searches

Review moat

Okay2,398

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Okay€10.84

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay64%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay87%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Bad€5.15–€16.29

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 64% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 falling

Sellers

48

Top-5 brand share

87%

Open market

9%

  • Compo29%
  • GREEN GUARDIA27%
  • PROTECT GARDEN14%
  • Substral10%
  • Neudorff7%
  • Novo Nem4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 9%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€26K20%€52K30%€78K40%€104K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +22.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung30%

“Alternative Pestizide”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit12%

“Super leichte Handhabung”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%

“macht was er verspricht👍🙋.”

Pflanzenwachstum7%

“Bestes mittel für Indoor Pflanzen, schon oft gekauft und immer wieder”

Stärke4%

“Wirksam”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Super Produkt, Preis/Leistung Top”

Sprühen/Durchfluss3%

“Das Spray ist einfach anzuwenden”

Effizienz3%

“Wirksam”

Geruch2%

“Geruchs neutral”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt29%

“Wirkung begrenzt”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung16%

“Ungeziefer tot”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis12%

“Geldverschwendung”

Pflanzenwachstum4%

“Hilft nicht bei Blattläusen”

Qualität insgesamt4%

“Wertloser Müll”

Stärke3%

“taugt gar nicht”

Sprühen/Durchfluss3%

“Spray wirkt überhaupt nicht”

Geruch3%

“Stinkt neuerdings”

Kontamination2%

“Schädlingsmittel”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Sie sind wirklich extrem klein”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt27%
Auslaufsicher17%
Sprühen/Durchfluss9%
Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung8%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%
Defekt Material/Teile4%
Umweltfreundlichkeit4%
Gesamtgröße3%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%
Feucht/Trocken3%