Skip to content
55

tepro holzkohlegrill

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a small market ($21K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 5Growth 95Conversion 12Competition 48Returns 100Price range 18Avg price 83Brand share 40Review moat 90Quality gap 84

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Incredible+122.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Great202.16

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€76.86

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay56%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay81%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Bad€32.81–€398.44

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Bad0.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€21K

€21K/yr · 30K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 56% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

29

Top-5 brand share

81%

Open market

17%

  • ACTIVA49%
  • TLGREEN18%
  • THÜROS5%
  • DEMA4%
  • Haushalt International4%
  • GLÜHZONE2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (10 brands, 17%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€2K20%€4K30%€6K40%€9K1101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 64 weeks — +122.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26MayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 8.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Montage/Installation21%

“Leichte Montage”

Grillen18%

“Super Grill”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Super Qualität”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis14%

“Für den Preis ganz okay”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Macht was er soll”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Handlich und einfach”

Haltbarkeit3%

“langlebig”

Gesamtgröße3%

“4 Personen gut geeignet”

Stärke3%

“Stabil”

Design insgesamt3%

“Optik super schön”

What buyers complain about

Montage/Installation25%

“Bissell weng Zeitaufwand beim Zusammenbau”

Qualität insgesamt12%

“Qualitätsmängel”

Gesamtgröße9%

“Nicht alles passt exakt”

Dicke8%

“Sehr dünnes Blech nicht besonders gut verarbeitet”

Defekt Material/Teile8%

“Wo gibt es Ersatzteile?”

Rost/Korrodieren7%

“Nur nach ein Jahr, rostet”

Stärke5%

“Etwas wackelig”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung2%

“Anleitung ist ne Katastrophe”

Metallqualität2%

“Die absolute Frechheit ist aber das Ding als Edelstahl zu bezeichnen”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Der wird wohl leider nur ein Jahr halten”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße30%
Grillen24%
Rost/Korrodieren10%
Defekt Material/Teile9%
Qualität insgesamt8%
Montage/Installation5%
Materialqualität4%
Stärke3%
Kratzfestigkeit3%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%