Skip to content
77

kescher angeln

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +158.0% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 56Growth 96Conversion 51Competition 82Returns 94Price range 69Avg price 78Brand share 83Review moat 75Quality gap 77

Growth

Incredible+158.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great52%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great33%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great€16.37

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good502.78

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good€4.49–€38.41

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good€410K

€410K/yr · 610K searches

Conversion

Good4.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (33% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

41 falling

Sellers

93

Top-5 brand share

52%

Open market

42%

  • NAKIHOUSE13%
  • Xndryan12%
  • wiipara11%
  • BigDean8%
  • WANGDEFU8%
  • Jsdoin6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€12K6%€25K9%€37K12%€49K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 58 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +158.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KPrime Day '24Spike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt18%

“Excellent quality”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%

“Erfüllt Zweck”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“Preis-/Leistung super”

Stärke9%

“Solide”

Gesamtgröße8%

“alles passt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Handhabung & Mobilität”

Einfache Reinigung5%

“Super zum pool reinigen”

Materialqualität3%

“Material ist Premium”

Haltbarkeit3%

“das Material wirkt robust und langlebig”

Montage/Installation2%

“Super leicht zusammen zu bauen und sehr stabil”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit23%

“Bei erster Benutzung gleich defekt”

Qualität insgesamt21%

“Fabrikneuer Müll”

Gesamtgröße12%

“Kleiner als gedacht”

Stärke8%

“Die Materialien sind viel zu dünn”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Leider unhandlich”

Materialqualität3%

“Billiges Material”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“100 % rausgeschmissenes Geld”

Griff2%

“die zusammenschiebbare Griffstange ist total wackelig”

Rost/Korrodieren2%

“Rostet schnell”

Geruch2%

“Stinkt wiederlich”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße45%
Defekt Material/Teile9%
Qualität insgesamt9%
Haltbarkeit6%
Materialqualität2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Geruch2%
Stärke2%
Dünn2%
Funktionalität insgesamt2%