Skip to content
62

grillrost gusseisen

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +157.9% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 6Growth 96Conversion 12Competition 85Returns 89Price range 80Avg price 95Brand share 72Review moat 70Quality gap 43

Growth

Incredible+157.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Incredible€35.53

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Great30%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Great€6.22–€110.37

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good62%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good705.44

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Bad0.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€25K

€25K/yr · 75K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (30% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

29 rising

Sellers

48

Top-5 brand share

62%

Open market

34%

  • GFTIME25%
  • tepro14%
  • BBQ-Toro11%
  • Denmay7%
  • EWH5%
  • Uniflasy5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€4914%€9836%€1K8%€2K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 75 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +157.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K4KPrime Day '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 7.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Grillen22%

“Grill”

Gesamtgröße21%

“Passt”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Fairer Deal”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Artikel wie vom Händler beschrieben”

Materialqualität3%

“Super Material”

Stärke3%

“Sehr Robust”

Montage/Installation3%

“in ca 90 Minuten alleine aufgebaut - absolut fair von der Zeit.”

Design insgesamt2%

“Das Design dieser "Kopie" ist durchdacht,”

Einfache Reinigung2%

“Leicht zu reinigen”

What buyers complain about

Grillen14%

“Grill mit gravoerenmdem problem”

Gesamtgröße13%

“Viel zu gross”

Haltbarkeit8%

“Nach 2 Jahren defekt”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Unzufrieden”

Rost/Korrodieren6%

“Starke Roststellen”

Wasserbeständigkeit5%

“Wasser läuft einfach durch”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“42€ war leider Lehrgeld”

Materialqualität4%

“Sehr schlechtes Material”

Dicke4%

“Dachte das Material sei etwas dicker”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Irreführende Abbildung”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße52%
Grillen20%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Qualität insgesamt4%
Dünn3%
Materialqualität3%
Funktionalität insgesamt3%
Rost/Korrodieren2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt1%