Skip to content
56

grillpfanne gasgrill

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +203.3% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 17Growth 97Conversion 61Competition 42Returns 97Price range 80Avg price 91Brand share 26Review moat 54Quality gap 28

Growth

Incredible+203.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€21.38

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€8.50–€42.58

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good1,322

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay60%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay89%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Bad€67K

€67K/yr · 58K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 60% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

28

Top-5 brand share

89%

Open market

8%

  • Enders61%
  • Raweao10%
  • AMNZOLXY8%
  • DUDSOEHO7%
  • Enzeno4%
  • nomiou3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€3K10%€7K15%€10K20%€13K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +203.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KPrime Day '24Holiday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 16.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Grillen26%

“Grill”

Gesamtgröße25%

“Alles super gepasst”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Solides Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Beste price für so ein toller scitz”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Hält was sie verspricht”

Materialqualität4%

“Robustes Material”

Stärke3%

“Solides Teil”

Wasserbeständigkeit2%

“echte Wasserdichtigkeit”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Robust,sehr gute Qualität und die erste Regendusche überstanden”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Praktisch”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße18%

“Passt nicht”

Grillen15%

“Der Grill wird darunter nass”

Dicke10%

“Das Material ist allerdings recht dünn”

Wasserbeständigkeit9%

“Nähte sind nicht wasserdicht”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“einfach nur Müll”

Materialqualität6%

“Sehr dünnes Material”

Haltbarkeit6%

“Haltbarkeit ca. 1 Jahr”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Schlechte Beschreibung”

Stärke2%

“Das Material ist extrem dünn”

Auslaufsicher1%

“Leider undicht”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße57%
Grillen19%
Dünn6%
Qualität insgesamt5%
Materialqualität4%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Defekt Material/Teile1%
Nähen/Finish/Polieren1%
Wasserbeständigkeit1%
Funktionalität insgesamt1%