Skip to content
64

dolphin poolroboter ersatzteile

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +558.8% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 3Growth 100Conversion 16Competition 78Returns 90Price range 59Avg price 93Brand share 56Review moat 93Quality gap 87

Growth

Incredible+558.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Great138.43

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Great€51.27

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Great37%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Good€11.88–€156.21

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good72%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Bad1.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€12K

€12K/yr · 18K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (37% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

23 falling

Sellers

38

Top-5 brand share

72%

Open market

25%

  • Dolphin37%
  • deawater12%
  • FFyan11%
  • Tyenaza7%
  • Cancanle6%
  • vhbw4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€3486%€6969%€1K12%€1K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)2 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 40 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 33 weeks — +558.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K750Spike '26Sep '25Oct '25Nov '25Dec '25Apr '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße48%

“Passt”

Filterung20%

“Guter Filter”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis15%

“Prima Preis”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Perfektes Ersatzteil”

Einfache Reinigung3%

“Er lässt sich auch gut reinigen”

What buyers complain about

Materialqualität17%

“1 Punkt Abzug weil für das Material zu teuer”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Leider ist die Qualität nicht so gut wie bei meinem vorherigen Filterkorb”

Haltbarkeit17%

“Alles Funktioniert, leider nach 1 Jahr ist er völlig vergilbt geworden”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt11%

“Man sollte doch erwähnen das das Gerät nicht mit dem original Kabel kompatibel ist, ansonsten Daumen hoch”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“teuer”

Rost/Korrodieren11%

“Kugellager rosten”

Defekt Material/Teile11%

“Super Ersatzteil”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße58%
Filterung8%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Produktzustand4%
Funktionalität insgesamt4%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt4%
Mechanismus probleme2%
Rost/Korrodieren2%
Qualität insgesamt2%