Skip to content
63

blaukorn dünger

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 42Growth 69Conversion 68Competition 56Returns 100Price range 79Avg price 95Brand share 64Review moat 78Quality gap 24

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€23.03

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€7.68–€44.48

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Great437

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Good+49.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Good6.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good67%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good51%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay€221K

€221K/yr · 157K searches

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

The top 5 products take 51% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

29

Top-5 brand share

67%

Open market

25%

  • versando16%
  • OPPENHÄUSER14%
  • Ruemar13%
  • Compo12%
  • COMPO EXPERT11%
  • Terra Domi9%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€9K8%€18K12%€27K16%€35K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 27 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +49.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 29.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt22%

“Hält, was er verspricht”

Qualität insgesamt22%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis20%

“preisgünstig”

Pflanzenwachstum13%

“Guter Wachstumsboost für das Gemüsebeet”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit7%

“sparsam in der Anwendung”

Umweltfreundlichkeit4%

“Was bleibt ist ein guter Biodünger”

Gesamtgröße3%

“passt”

Farbe2%

“Er ist schön blau”

Effizienz2%

“Funktioniert perfekt”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung1%

“Genau nach Anweisung anwenden”

What buyers complain about

Geruch28%

“Geruch näh, Effizienz ja”

Funktionalität insgesamt11%

“Keine Wow Effekt”

Farbe11%

“grün braucht blau”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt9%

“sind nicht verfügbar”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Im Gegensatz zu kleineren Packungen in Märkten preisgünstig”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Leider hoher Verbrauch”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße29%
Pflanzenwachstum14%
Umweltfreundlichkeit14%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis14%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit14%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%