Skip to content
50

schwarze sonnenbrille

Worth a look

Shows beatable incumbent ratings (4.2★), but a small market ($27K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 7Growth 62Conversion 19Competition 76Returns 23Price range 53Avg price 61Brand share 77Review moat 43Quality gap 80

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Great58%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great39%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Growth

Good+39.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Good€13.28

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€4.99–€26.42

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,180.12

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Bad6.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad1.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€27K

€27K/yr · 129K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (39% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

26 falling

Sellers

30

Top-5 brand share

58%

Open market

37%

  • FEISEDY16%
  • GQUEEN15%
  • ANYLUV11%
  • CGID10%
  • Joopin5%
  • kimorn5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€7996%€2K9%€2K12%€3K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 43 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +39.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KPrime Day '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt23%

“Super Qualität”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis17%

“Gutes Angebot”

Gesamtgröße12%

“Passt perfekt”

Form/Stil10%

“coole Form”

Komfort insgesamt6%

“und lange tragen”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Alle Erwartungen erfüllt”

Stärke5%

“Sehr stabil gefertigt, und sieht cool aus”

Design insgesamt3%

“Design”

Farbe3%

“Die Farben sind Klasse”

Gewicht leicht2%

“Sie ist leicht, gut verarbeitet und schützt die Augen optimal”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße20%

“Fällt sehr klein aus”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“billiger Look und zu breit”

Materialqualität10%

“Billiges Material”

Schutz9%

“Es handelt sich definitiv nicht um eine Schutzfolie”

Produktzustand4%

“Benutzt und verdreckt, aber als neu verkauft”

Stärke4%

“Etwas instabil”

Gewicht schwer3%

“Schwer vom Gewicht her”

Form/Stil3%

“nicht für jede Gesichtsform geeignet, deshalb wieder zurück”

Sichtweite3%

“Glas flimmert”

Haltbarkeit2%

“leider fast sofort kaputt.”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße67%
Qualität insgesamt8%
Farbe4%
Breite4%
Form/Stil3%
Funktionalität insgesamt3%
Materialqualität2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Kratzfestigkeit1%
Defekt Material/Teile1%