Skip to content
61

lange socken herren

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.8%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 30Growth 52Conversion 76Competition 93Returns 96Price range 54Avg price 59Brand share 62Review moat 25Quality gap 43

Returns

Incredible0.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Great22%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Conversion

Great7.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good68%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Avg price

Good€13.10

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€6.25–€25.22

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+23.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay€137K

€137K/yr · 143K searches

Review moat

Bad4,103.97

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (22% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

29 rising

Sellers

160

Top-5 brand share

68%

Open market

28%

  • Champion24%
  • sockenkauf2422%
  • PUMA10%
  • adidas6%
  • Wamicu5%
  • FALARY4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€3K4%€5K6%€8K8%€11K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 109 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 52 weeks — +23.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt28%

“Good quality”

Gesamtgröße18%

“Passt”

Komfort insgesamt16%

“Super bequem”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Bestes Preis-/Leistungsverhältnis”

Materialqualität4%

“feste Material, cool.”

Weiches Gefühl3%

“Soft und gut zu tragen”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Bestellt und wurde bestens bedient”

Atmungsaktivität2%

“Das Material ist atmungsaktiv”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%

“Wie erwartet”

Übung/Sporteignung1%

“Besonders für Sport, Arbeit oder den Alltag sind sie sehr angenehm zu tragen”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt24%

“Qualität fraglich”

Gesamtgröße12%

“Fallen kleiner aus”

Haltbarkeit9%

“Defekt nach 1 mal tragen”

Lücke/Loch8%

“Löcher beim ersten Tragen”

Dicke7%

“Das Material ist relativ dick”

Nähen/Finish/Polieren4%

“Nähte schlecht verarbeitet”

Dünn3%

“Etwas dünnes Material”

Materialqualität3%

“Das Material ist extrem dünn”

Geeignet für Maschinenwäsche2%

“Einmal waschen, direkt eingelaufen”

Komfort insgesamt2%

“unbequem”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße32%
Qualität insgesamt14%
Dünn11%
Länge9%
Materialqualität6%
Füße fit3%
Lücke/Loch3%
Farbe3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Breite2%