Skip to content
56

hugo boss sonnenbrille herren

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 24% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 37Growth 78Conversion 11Competition 91Returns 22Price range 87Avg price 87Brand share 29Review moat 53Quality gap 77

Competition

Great24%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great€67.46

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€8.91–€103.41

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Great+68.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good1,396

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay€183K

€183K/yr · 319K searches

Brand share

Okay87%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Returns

Bad6.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad0.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (24% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

19 rising

Sellers

83

Top-5 brand share

87%

Open market

10%

  • Ray-Ban47%
  • Lacoste15%
  • Boss11%
  • HUGO8%
  • Tommy Hilfiger7%
  • Calvin Klein Jeans2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (13 brands, 10%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€4K4%€7K6%€11K8%€15K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 94 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +68.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 6.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt29%

“Super Produkt”

Gesamtgröße21%

“Passt perfekt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis18%

“Preislich gut”

Komfort insgesamt9%

“super Tragecomfort”

Gewicht leicht6%

“Leicht und edel”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Hält was sie verspricht”

Form/Stil2%

“Schlicht, elegant und stylisch zugleich”

Breite2%
Übung/Sporteignung2%

“Tolle Brille, sowohl zum Fahrrad- als auch zum Skifahren”

Geschenk Zweck2%

“War ein Geschenk und sah top aus”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt28%

“Plastikschrott”

Gesamtgröße18%

“Zu gross”

Haltbarkeit11%

“Defekt nach kurzer Zeit”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Sehr enttäuschend für den Preis”

Dicke7%

“Dünner rahmen”

Farbe5%

“Schon Farbe weg”

Stärke2%
Materialqualität2%

“Billiges Plastikgestell”

Umweltfreundlichkeit2%

“Nicht Nachhaltig”

Verschluss Qualität1%

“Die Scharniere laufen nicht flüssig”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße66%
Qualität insgesamt6%
Breite5%
Farbe5%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Form/Stil3%
Kratzfestigkeit2%
Produktzustand1%
Materialqualität1%
Defekt Material/Teile1%