Skip to content
38

fussball handschuhe herren

Skip it

Soft demand (-89.2% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 6Growth 0Conversion 5Competition 72Returns 39Price range 88Avg price 89Brand share 29Review moat 35Quality gap 81

Avg price

Great€20.58

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€9.11–€73.80

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good42%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Returns

Okay4.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Okay3,009.37

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay88%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Bad€25K

€25K/yr · 314K searches

Conversion

Bad0.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-89.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 42% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 rising

Sellers

144

Top-5 brand share

88%

Open market

10%

  • NIKE71%
  • adidas6%
  • Unigear4%
  • BLUEVER4%
  • ihuan3%
  • FanVince2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (10 brands, 10%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€1K8%€2K12%€3K16%€4K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 43 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -89.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
45K35KSpike '24Black Friday '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 18.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Wärme16%

“Super warm”

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Super Produkt”

Gesamtgröße13%

“Passt”

Komfort insgesamt6%

“Angenehmer softer Handschuh”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“super Preis/Leistung”

Griff6%

“Super Grip”

Übung/Sporteignung5%

“super Trainingshandschuhe”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Produkt funktioniert wie beschrieben”

Wasserbeständigkeit4%

“sind gut wasserabweisend”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“auch gut um das Handy zu bedienen”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße19%

“Grösse”

Wärme11%

“Nicht warm”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Ganz schlechte Qualität”

Eignung Winterwetter5%

“Schlecht im Winter für was sie gekauft wurden”

Heizung4%

“Die Handschuhe wärmen überhaupt nicht”

Geruch3%

“Produkt Stinkt”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Ist nach wenigen Monaten bereits defekt”

Dicke3%

“da sehr dünn”

Griff3%

“lediglich der Gripp auf der Grifffläche ist unzureichend, am Lenkrad und am Fahrradlenker zu rutschig.”

Materialqualität2%

“Sehr dünnes Material”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße76%
Qualität insgesamt4%
Wärme4%
Nähen/Finish/Polieren2%
Komfort insgesamt2%
Dünn1%
Materialqualität1%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%
Haltbarkeit1%
Geruch1%