Skip to content
58

steckdosenadapter usb

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.6%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 55Growth 18Conversion 83Competition 74Returns 97Price range 59Avg price 44Brand share 83Review moat 25Quality gap 32

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great8.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Great52%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Good41%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Good€4.66–€29.81

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good€382K

€382K/yr · 381K searches

Avg price

Okay€11.28

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad4,083.82

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-13.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 41% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

27 falling

Sellers

52

Top-5 brand share

52%

Open market

43%

  • Aimoze15%
  • BOLUX-JS12%
  • Anker10%
  • Aioneus8%
  • sccvee6%
  • LumFocus5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€15K8%€31K12%€46K16%€61K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 34 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -13.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KPrime Day '24Spike '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Aufladen38%

“fast charge”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Quality”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%

“Das Produkt tut, was es soll”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Super Deal”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker5%

“USB C plus Adaptern”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Einfache Handhabung, funktioniert einwandfrei”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Portabilität2%

“Dient als Reisebegleiter”

Stärke1%

“robust”

Haltbarkeit1%

“Fast 1 Jahrelang im Einsatz”

What buyers complain about

Aufladen37%

“Ist ein Slow-charger”

Haltbarkeit17%

“Fällt auseinander”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Qualität ungenügend”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker6%

“USB-Ports defekt”

Heizung6%

“Wird nicht warm”

Funktionalität insgesamt5%

“Fällt schon fast von selbst raus”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Fakeangaben”

Defekt Material/Teile2%

“unzuverlässiges Teil”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt1%

“Eingeschränkte Kompatibilität selbst beim Basisstandard 5V 1A”

Geräuschpegel1%

“macht seltsame Geräusche beim laden”

Top return reasons

Aufladen42%
Gesamtgröße11%
Funktionalität insgesamt10%
Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker8%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt7%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Heizung3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Stärke2%
Geräuschpegel2%