Skip to content
66

e zigarette

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.3%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 77Growth 20Conversion 9Competition 86Returns 99Price range 80Avg price 84Brand share 53Review moat 91Quality gap 96

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Incredible4.0★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Great172.18

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Great29%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great€18.60

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€5.09–€57.88

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Great€955K

€955K/yr · 7.4M searches

Brand share

Good73%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-9.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (29% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

19 falling

Sellers

57

Top-5 brand share

73%

Open market

20%

  • ELF Bar39%
  • X-SPACE12%
  • GeekVape8%
  • Vaporesso7%
  • Lifeofvape7%
  • Generisch7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€29K6%€57K9%€86K12%€115K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 67 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -9.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
225K175KSepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis13%

“fairer Preis”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit12%

“einfache Handhabung”

Akkulaufzeit11%

“Super Akku - hält lange”

Geschmack5%

“Lecker Aromen”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Erfüllt seinen Zweck”

Geschmack insgesamt4%

“Schmeckt”

Geruch2%

“Aroma”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

Aufladen2%

“lädt über USB-C angenehm schnell wieder auf.”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit17%

“Keine Haltbarkeit”

Aufladen14%

“Dann muss man nochmals laden”

Qualität insgesamt12%

“Absoluter Müll”

Auslaufsicher10%

“Verlieren liquid nach wenig Zeit”

Funktionalität insgesamt7%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Akkulaufzeit5%

“Bei der einen ist der Akku defekt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Geld Verschwendung”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit3%

“Kleben überhaupt nicht”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Gerät ist defekt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Irreführende Artikelbeschreibung”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt30%
Defekt Material/Teile12%
Aufladen11%
Auslaufsicher9%
Akkulaufzeit5%
Gesamtgröße4%
Haltbarkeit4%
Qualität insgesamt3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Gesamt anzeigen2%