Skip to content
51

o2 guthaben

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (27.3% search→purchase), but soft demand (-58.1% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 66Growth 0Conversion 100Competition 0Returns 94Price range 83Avg price 95Brand share 0Review moat 65Quality gap 96

Conversion

Incredible27.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Incredible3.9★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Incredible€30.67

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great€2.26–€85.16

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good€643K

€643K/yr · 77K searches

Review moat

Good913.43

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-58.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad100%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 100% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

5 flat

Sellers

7

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • ClearO240%
  • Atgreen23%
  • PUMA19%
  • O29%
  • Pedea9%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€64K20%€129K30%€193K40%€257K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 7 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 85 weeks — -58.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KHoliday '24Spike '25Spike '26DecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Feb, Mar, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Portabilität14%

“Tragbare Sauerstoff Flasche für unterwegs”

Stärke14%

“Hilft super”

Konnektivität – insgesamt14%

“Der Router funktioniert einwandfrei”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%

“Tut was er soll”

Komfort insgesamt14%

“Sehr bequem und absolut rutschfest, dass arbeiten ist angenehm darin”

Gesamtgröße14%

“Größe passt”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“tolle Firma - tolles Produkt”

What buyers complain about

Geruch29%

“komisches aroma”

Atmungsaktivität21%

“Zwei mal durchatmen und Flaschen leer”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Müll hoch O2”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%

“Ohne das grüne Ventil wie Bild kann man gar nicht nutzen”

Hartes Gefühl7%

“Es fällt mir schwer”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Der Knopf ist klein”

Komfort insgesamt5%

“hat scharfe Kanten, wodurch die Anwendung unangenehm ist”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“sehr schwer zu drücken”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt32%
Sim-Karte / Probleme mit dem Fach20%
Gesamtgröße9%
Konnektivität – insgesamt7%
Gelenkschmerzen4%
Auslaufsicher4%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Haltbarkeit2%
Schlafqualität2%
Zertifizierungen2%