Skip to content
54

löwenzahn

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a small market ($54K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 14Growth 22Conversion 40Competition 72Returns 100Price range 71Avg price 79Brand share 72Review moat 62Quality gap 58

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€16.49

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Good42%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good62%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Good€1.99–€46.73

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good1,002.9

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Okay3.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-6.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€54K

€54K/yr · 104K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 42% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

25 rising

Sellers

65

Top-5 brand share

62%

Open market

32%

  • Schoenenberger18%
  • natural elements17%
  • JR Farm11%
  • TRUE NATURE9%
  • vom-Achterhof7%
  • Salus6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€2K6%€3K9%€5K12%€7K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 41 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 82 weeks — -6.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KSpike '25Black Friday '25Holiday '25Spike '26JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Mar · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt26%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Fairer Preis”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Hält was es verspricht”

Reguliert die Verdauung5%

“Gutes für den Stoffwechsel”

Geschmack insgesamt4%

“Tadellos”

Dosierung4%

“einfach dosieren.”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt3%

“Mir war wichtig, ein hochdosiertes, pflanzliches Leber-Supplement ohne unnötige Zusatzstoffe zu finden – und genau das bietet dieses Produkt”

Vegan/Biologisch3%

“vegan & ohne unnötige Zusatzstoffe”

Einfaches Kauen/Schlucken3%

“Sind gut zu schlucken”

Effizienz3%

“Positive Aspekte”

What buyers complain about

Geschmack insgesamt9%

“Geschmack ungenießbar”

Funktionalität insgesamt8%

“Bislang noch kein Erfolg”

Geschmack8%

“Geschmack ungenießbar”

Bitter6%

“Bitter”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Blöd wenn man die halbe wiese mitbezahlen muss”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Sehr groß und knackig”

Geruch4%

“Tabletten stinken”

Reguliert die Verdauung3%

“Sodbrennen”

Dosierung3%

“Zu niedrig dosiert”

Nebenwirkungen3%

“Negative Aspekte”

Top return reasons

Fluchtsicher100%