Skip to content
57

inhalationsgerät

Worth a look

Shows a $4.9M/yr market, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 97Growth 0Conversion 65Competition 38Returns 65Price range 87Avg price 95Brand share 46Review moat 42Quality gap 76

Market size

Incredible€4.9M

€4.9M/yr · 3.0M searches

Avg price

Incredible€28.67

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€8.28–€76.23

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Good5.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Good2.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Okay77%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay2,339.32

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay62%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-57.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 62% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

93

Top-5 brand share

77%

Open market

20%

  • JOSSIS24%
  • Beurer22%
  • AU YAT18%
  • Oxeza10%
  • VapoZen3%
  • Servoprax3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€489K20%€979K30%€1.5M40%€2.0M101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 22 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -57.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
125K75KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Mar, Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Benutzerfreundlichkeit20%

“easy to handle”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Great quality”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Super Preis/Leistung”

Portabilität6%

“Transportabler Inhalator”

Einfache Reinigung5%

“Ließ sich gut reinigen”

Effizienz4%

“Funktioniert”

Atmungsaktivität4%

“Inhalation klapp wunderbar”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“tut was er soll”

Akkulaufzeit3%

“Handling + Akku - Das Gerät hat ein angenehmes Handling”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit28%

“Nach 1x defekt”

Qualität insgesamt9%

“Absolutes Müllteil”

Akkulaufzeit7%

“Akku hält keine 12 min”

Aufladen6%

“Muss pausenlos laden”

Funktionalität insgesamt6%

“Hält nicht”

Auslaufsicher4%

“it leaks every single time I fill it up”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Dichtungsring Passt nicht mehr”

Einfache Reinigung2%

“Defekte Selbstreinigung”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“sehr unpraktisch”

Defekt Material/Teile2%

“Gerät defekt”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt25%
Defekt Material/Teile16%
Gesamtgröße8%
Haltbarkeit7%
Auslaufsicher6%
Aufladen6%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Stärke2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Ständiger Neustart oder Neustart2%