Skip to content
70

glucomannan pulver

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 55Growth 95Conversion 59Competition 77Returns 100Price range 81Avg price 90Brand share 2Review moat 72Quality gap 73

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Incredible+128.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great€20.99

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€10.02–€38.73

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Great38%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good630.64

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good5.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good€379K

€379K/yr · 356K searches

Brand share

Bad99%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (38% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

6 rising

Sellers

27

Top-5 brand share

99%

Open market

0%

  • MORE NUTRITION50%
  • inkospor38%
  • Layenberger5%
  • ahead4%
  • Warrior1%
  • IronMaxx1%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€11K6%€23K9%€34K12%€45K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)2 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 44 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +128.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KPrime Day '24Spike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geschmack insgesamt39%

“Yummy”

Geschmack12%

“Chunky Flavor”

Ernährungs Gehalt9%

“Bester Protein Shake”

Qualität insgesamt5%

“Super Produkt”

Süße4%

“Super altanative zum süßen”

Löslichkeit4%

“problemlos lösbar”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%

“Preis super”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Wie abgebildet geliefert”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Doch recht einfach gemacht”

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt1%

“Konsistenz ok”

What buyers complain about

Geschmack insgesamt23%

“Ungenießbar”

Süße13%

“Leider unglaublich süß”

Geschmack7%

“More Chunky flavour”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Geldverschwendung”

Künstliche Süßstoffe6%

“steckt voller Süßstoffe”

Auslaufsicher3%

“Undicht”

Löslichkeit3%

“löst sich extrem schlecht auf”

Ernährungs Gehalt3%

“Nicht sicher glutenfrei”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“Absolut billiger Müll”

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt2%

“Konsistenz ausbaufähig”

Top return reasons

Ernährungs Gehalt30%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt15%
Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt10%
Süße10%
Geschmack10%
Geschmack insgesamt10%
Gewichtsverlust10%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%