Skip to content
58

ginkobil 120mg 120 stück

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 44Growth 18Conversion 94Competition 50Returns 99Price range 94Avg price 95Brand share 42Review moat 77Quality gap 42

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€36.03

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great11.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Great€14.31–€65.28

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Great450.04

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay55%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay€230K

€230K/yr · 55K searches

Brand share

Okay80%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-13.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 55% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

31

Top-5 brand share

80%

Open market

16%

  • ratiopharm55%
  • VROODY7%
  • AL Aliud Pharma7%
  • STADA6%
  • avenar pharma5%
  • Vit4ever4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (10 brands, 16%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€12K10%€23K15%€35K20%€46K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 23 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -13.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K750Prime Day '25Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt26%

“High Quality- Fair Price”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis12%

“High Quality- Fair Price”

Fokusverbesserung9%

“Jetzt wird sie zur Super-Brain – 365 Tage volle Power”

Dosierung8%

“pro Tablette ordentlich hoch.”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Produkt wie beschrieben”

Effizienz6%

“Wirkt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Gut einzunehmen”

Ernährungs Gehalt3%

“weiteren wichtigen Nährstoffen.”

Herzgesundheit3%

“Verbessert die Durchblutung spürbar”

Gesamtgröße3%

“passt alles”

What buyers complain about

Dosierung19%

“Nicht wie im Text 6000 mg”

Nebenwirkungen16%

“krine bennenswerte Wirkung”

Funktionalität insgesamt10%

“Wirksamkeit fraglich”

Geschmack insgesamt7%

“Geschmack ist ekelhaft”

Gesamtgröße7%

“Die Tabletten sind sehr klein, ist gut”

Einfaches Kauen/Schlucken5%

“Trockene Presslinge Vorsicht bei Schluckbeschwerden”

Ernährungs Gehalt5%

“Produkt kann nicht super Gesund sein mit Sorbitol”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Falschangaben”

Vitamin2%

“Nicht die richtigen Vitamine”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt2%

“Da diese nicht deklariert sind, muss man von den günstigsten, inaktiven Formen ausgehen (z. B. Pyridoxin statt P-5-P oder synthetische Folsäure statt Methylfolat).”

Top return reasons

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt50%
Funktionalität insgesamt25%
Geruch25%