Skip to content
56

gelbe säcke

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 76Growth 17Conversion 98Competition 39Returns 99Price range 66Avg price 71Brand share 26Review moat 47Quality gap 43

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible16.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Great€883K

€883K/yr · 377K searches

Avg price

Good€14.47

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€3.31–€38.03

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay1,758.45

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay61%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay90%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-16.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 61% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

12 rising

Sellers

15

Top-5 brand share

90%

Open market

8%

  • BKB37%
  • Sperling33%
  • VARIOSAN11%
  • kör4u6%
  • Roxus3%
  • BigDean3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (6 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€44K10%€88K15%€132K20%€177K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 20 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -16.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt19%

“Top Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis19%

“Preis super”

Stärke13%

“Stabiler gelber Sack”

Gesamtgröße10%

“Passt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Genau das was ich wollte”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“mit etwas vorsichtiger Handhabung gut zu gebrauchen.”

Haltbarkeit4%

“Gute Verarbeitung”

Einfache Reinigung3%

“Lässt sich auch einfach und problemlos reinigen”

Dicke3%

“Dicke Tüten”

Farbe2%

“Und dieses Gelb”

What buyers complain about

Dicke22%

“sehr dünnes Material”

Qualität insgesamt20%

“Sehr schlechte Qualität,reissen”

Haltbarkeit14%

“Säcke reißen leider sehr leicht”

Stärke14%

“Material sehr dünn”

Materialqualität6%

“Material sehr dünn”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Öffnung zu klein”

Dünn3%

“Sack sehr dünn”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Geldverschwendung”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Die Beutel lassen sich kaum öffnen”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Entsprechen nicht den Produktfotos”

Top return reasons

Dünn21%
Gesamtgröße21%
Qualität insgesamt12%
Defekt Material/Teile8%
Montage/Installation7%
Materialqualität4%
Haltbarkeit4%
Dicke3%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt3%
Stärke2%