Skip to content
45

dr pearl aktivkohlefilter 9mm

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 14Growth 37Conversion 100Competition 11Returns 99Price range 85Avg price 95Brand share 0Review moat 67Quality gap 38

Conversion

Incredible28.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€27.99

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€6.98–€71.96

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good822.56

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+10.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€56K

€56K/yr · 7K searches

Competition

Bad87%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 87% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

4 falling

Sellers

25

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • VAUEN56%
  • Aasonida36%
  • Dr.Perl6%
  • Dr. Perl Filter3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€6K20%€11K30%€17K40%€22K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 9 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +10.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
400300Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Filterung43%

“Beste Filter”

Gesamtgröße20%

“Passt”

Qualität insgesamt18%

“Top Qualität”

Haltbarkeit4%

“Sind okay, verwende sie schon seit Jahren”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Genau wie beschrieben”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Ich finde sie gut brauchbar”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt21%

“Qualität über Amazon immer schlechter”

Gesamtgröße21%

“fahlen kleiner aus”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis18%

“Und die Preise sind bei anderen Verkäufern 7-10 € teurer”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Achtung ist falsch beschrieben”

Luftreinigung7%

“kann diese Filter nicht mehr empfehlen”

Filterung4%

“dann ist der Filter nicht ganz dicht”

Top return reasons

Filterung43%
Gesamtgröße29%
Farbe14%
Qualität insgesamt14%