Skip to content
52

creatin mit geschmack

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a small market ($76K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 19Growth 35Conversion 78Competition 52Returns 100Price range 75Avg price 80Brand share 29Review moat 50Quality gap 53

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€17.15

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great7.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Great€7.53–€37.76

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good54%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay1,515.52

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Okay+8.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Okay88%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Bad€76K

€76K/yr · 56K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 54% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

9 falling

Sellers

35

Top-5 brand share

88%

Open market

8%

  • Body Attack41%
  • GEN GERMAN ELITE NUTRITION23%
  • ESN13%
  • OLIMP SPORT NUTRITION6%
  • Warrior5%
  • Gym Nutrition4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€4K10%€8K15%€11K20%€15K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt18%

“very good qualit”

Löslichkeit11%

“sich easy in den Shake mischen.”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Super Preis-Leistung”

Geschmack insgesamt9%

“Schmeckt super”

Geschmack9%

“Super Geschmack”

Ernährungs Gehalt4%

“Bester Hersteller hoch effizienter Supplements”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt3%

“Es handelt sich um ein reines Monoprodukt ohne Aromen, Süßstoffe oder sonstige Zusätze – also klassisches Creatin ohne Marketing-Blend”

Energieniveau3%

“Mehr Power im Alltag”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Macht seinen Job”

Linderung von Muskelschmerzen3%

“Super für Muskelaufbau usw empfo”

What buyers complain about

Geruch13%

“Stinkt nur sehr”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Preislich müll”

Geschmack insgesamt9%

“Geschmack Problem”

Geschmack6%

“Geschmack Problem”

Löslichkeit5%

“Löslichkeit”

Dosierung4%

“Dosierlöffel fehlt”

Qualität insgesamt4%

“habe keinerlei Vorteile, ein Produkt positiv zu bewerten.”

Süße3%

“Zu Süß”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Irreführende Angabe der Anzahl an Portionen”

Künstliche Süßstoffe2%

“keine Süßungsmittel”

Top return reasons

Geschmack insgesamt30%
Funktionalität insgesamt20%
Zertifizierungen20%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit10%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%
Geschmack10%