Skip to content
57

cosmea samen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 11Growth 45Conversion 83Competition 61Returns 100Price range 67Avg price 25Brand share 44Review moat 96Quality gap 72

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Incredible79.2

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Great8.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good€1.99–€41.36

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good48%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Okay+15.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Okay79%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Avg price

Okay€8.92

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Bad€43K

€43K/yr · 54K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 48% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 flat

Sellers

30

Top-5 brand share

79%

Open market

14%

  • Deine Gartenwelt22%
  • COSMEA19%
  • Kiepenkerl19%
  • Gärtner's erste Wahl! bobby-seeds.com9%
  • Sperli9%
  • Germisem7%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€4K20%€9K30%€13K40%€17K1101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 30 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 12 weeks — +15.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KApr '26May '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Pflanzenwachstum31%

“Alle Samen aufgewachsen”

Qualität insgesamt19%

“Das ist eine gute Qualität”

Komfort insgesamt13%

“angenehmem Tragen.”

Geschenk Zweck8%

“war ein Geschenk”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung8%

“Schöne Anleitung”

Weiches Gefühl8%

“Super weich sehr angenehm zu tragen”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Hält was es verspricht”

Geruch4%

“die Binde kommt ohne unangenehme Duftstoffe aus.”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passform, Saugfähigkeit und angenehmem Tragen”

Saugfähigkeit2%

“Saugfähigkeit”

What buyers complain about

Haftung/Klebrigkeit21%

“Negativ: Die Klebkraft ist schlecht”

Funktionalität insgesamt14%

“leider gar kein Ergebnis”

Produktzustand14%

“Produkt verändert, nicht mehr verträglich”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis14%

“zu teuer”

Pflanzenwachstum14%

“Keine einzige aufgegangen”

Form/Stil11%

“sie bleiben nicht in Form”

Top return reasons

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt38%
Gesamtgröße25%
Qualität insgesamt25%
Materialqualität13%