Skip to content
52

benfotiamin

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but soft demand (-19.2% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 50Growth 15Conversion 83Competition 26Returns 100Price range 92Avg price 95Brand share 19Review moat 76Quality gap 48

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€31.08

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€12.84–€65.03

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Great9.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Great488

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€276K

€276K/yr · 99K searches

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay70%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Bad92%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Growth

Bad-19.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 70% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 rising

Sellers

25

Top-5 brand share

92%

Open market

6%

  • milgamma67%
  • biomo pharma GmbH12%
  • Bloom Naturals Beauty Supplements7%
  • Bodfeld Apotheke4%
  • ratiopharm2%
  • Glycowohl2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 6%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€28K20%€55K30%€83K40%€111K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -19.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '24Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt21%

“Das Produkt ist hochwertig”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis20%

“Super Preis”

Vitamin18%

“Vitamin”

Effizienz8%

“Wirk zuverlässig”

Gelenkschmerzen4%

“Für meinen Nervensystem, besonders weil es Benfotiamin hat”

Linderung von Muskelschmerzen4%

“B1 hilft gut gegen Muskelschmerzen( unruhige Beine).”

Dosierung4%

“Selbst mein doc sagt das 250mg tagesdosis an thiamin optimal sind um die Pumpe zu fördern”

Gesamtgröße3%

“passt mir sehr gut”

Entzündung3%

“Bei Hautkrankheiten von Ärzten empfohlen”

Magnesium3%

“Enthält Magnesiumstereat schön verpackt als Magnesiumsalze der Speisefettsäuren”

What buyers complain about

Vitamin15%

“Leider gehe ich für mich auf einen Vitamin B komplex zurück”

Allergien15%

“gereizt in den Beinen”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Für mich, Müll”

Säureregulator/Linderung von Magenschmerzen11%

“Hat meinem Magen nicht gut getan”

Dosierung6%

“Geringere Gesamtaufnahme”

Einfaches Kauen/Schlucken6%

“Lassen sich nicht so gut schlucken”

Geruch6%

“Stinkt widerlich”

Bitter6%

“sind bitter”

Geschmack insgesamt4%

“Geschmacklich nicht gut”

Geschmack4%

“Geschmacklich nicht gut”

Top return reasons

Qualität insgesamt33%
Kalzium33%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt33%