Skip to content
53

augentropfen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 96% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 91Growth 20Conversion 91Competition 38Returns 99Price range 55Avg price 57Brand share 10Review moat 38Quality gap 33

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Great€1.8M

€1.8M/yr · 1.3M searches

Conversion

Great11.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Good€12.87

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€5.84–€26.31

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Okay62%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay2,662.72

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-9.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad96%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 62% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

7 falling

Sellers

39

Top-5 brand share

96%

Open market

2%

  • HYLO EYE CARE66%
  • Hylo-Vision13%
  • Bepanthen9%
  • by Amazon6%
  • VIZOL S2%
  • GLAMLENS2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (1 brand, 2%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€179K20%€358K30%€538K40%€717K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 18 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -9.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KSpike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Augenhygiene17%

“Super Augen Tropfen”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Bestes Produkt”

Feucht/Trocken13%

“Für trockene Augen”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis12%

“Preis war super”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit7%

“Richtige Handhabung”

Effizienz6%

“Klappt bestens”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Ware wie bestellt”

Komfort insgesamt4%

“Sehr angenehm”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Gute Verträglichkeit”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis23%

“Hochpreisig”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Nicht gut zu Dosieren”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Die Portion der Tropfen sind zu klein, hier bitte nachbessern”

Dosierung6%

“Schlecht zu dosieren”

Qualität insgesamt6%

“sind deutlich schlechter als Markenprodukte”

Funktionalität insgesamt6%

“erfüllen nicht den Zweck.”

Empfindlichkeit insgesamt5%

“Meine Augen reagierten empfindlich darauf”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Irreführend, kein Gel”

Produktzustand3%

“B-Ware erhalten obwohl neuen Artikel bestellt”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Keine lange Wirkdauer”