Skip to content
50

aqua clean

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but soft demand (-14.9% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 24Growth 18Conversion 82Competition 61Returns 99Price range 79Avg price 94Brand share 39Review moat 34Quality gap 21

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€22.64

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great8.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Great€9.06–€38.44

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good49%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay81%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay3,109.09

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad€96K

€96K/yr · 49K searches

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-14.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 49% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 rising

Sellers

125

Top-5 brand share

81%

Open market

13%

  • YACHTICON27%
  • PHILIPS25%
  • Aqua Clean17%
  • Waterdrop7%
  • FILSWA7%
  • AQUA CREST5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (7 brands, 13%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€4K8%€8K12%€12K16%€15K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 33 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -14.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße22%

“Filter passt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis19%

“Preis /Leistung super”

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Super Produkt”

Filterung15%

“Beste Filter”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%

“Erfüllt sein Zweck”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt3%

“Passend für PHILIPS Fully automatic espresso machine 2200 series”

Einfache Reinigung3%

“Aqua Clean für Philips Kaffeevollautomat”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Easy handzuhaben”

Effizienz2%

“So haben ihn jetzt das erste Ma drin alles super und klappt einwandfrei”

Haltbarkeit2%

“alles gut verlaufen”

What buyers complain about

Filterung30%

“Ein Filter ist defekt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis20%

“Nie wieder 28€ umsonst”

Funktionalität insgesamt6%

“nicht funktioniert”

Qualität insgesamt5%

“Diese sind minderwertig”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt5%

“Nicht für yphilips 5400 geeignet”

Verklemmen/Verstopfen4%

“Partikel verstopfen Maschine”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Zu teuer und miese Haltbarkeit”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Hält nicht was es verspricht”

Wasserbeständigkeit2%

“Die Maschine zieht kein Wasser mehr”

Gesamtgröße1%

“Haben nicht gepasst”

Top return reasons

Filterung29%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt18%
Gesamtgröße18%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt9%
Funktionalität insgesamt7%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Wasserbeständigkeit2%
Geräuschpegel2%
Defekt Material/Teile2%
Produktzustand1%