Skip to content
50

abc wärmepflaster

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.4%), but soft demand (-39.1% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 35Growth 5Conversion 85Competition 41Returns 98Price range 70Avg price 74Brand share 25Review moat 42Quality gap 80

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great9.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Good€14.87

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€3.72–€41.85

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,299.14

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay60%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay€173K

€173K/yr · 122K searches

Brand share

Okay90%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-39.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 60% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 falling

Sellers

61

Top-5 brand share

90%

Open market

7%

  • SOS51%
  • TerraTherm24%
  • THE HEAT COMPANY7%
  • MYMULIKE5%
  • Rheumaplast4%
  • PHARMA PERLE3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€9K10%€17K15%€26K20%€35K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 21 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -39.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KSpike '24Spike '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Wärme16%

“Warm”

Heizer8%

“Solide Wärmeleistung”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Bestes Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Preis auch ok”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Anwendung unkompliziert”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“tut was er soll”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit5%

“Haften auch supergut”

Komfort insgesamt4%

“Und angenehm”

Weiches Gefühl3%

“Das Material fühlt sich angenehm weich an, sitzt bequem und lässt sich gut anpassen, ohne zu drücken oder zu verrutschen”

Linderung von Muskelschmerzen3%

“Super bei kleinen Verspannungen”

What buyers complain about

Heizung23%

“Bringt null Wärme”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit14%

“Klebematerial hält nicht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Geld Verschwendung”

Qualität insgesamt4%

“Ungünstig”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“null Wirkung”

Allergien3%

“Rötung und Blasenbildung”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Löst sich nach 30 Minuten”

Wärme3%

“Wird nicht warm”

Schmerzlinderung – insgesamt2%

“Verletzungsgefahr”

Heizer2%

“Es wird nicht warm”

Top return reasons

Haftung/Klebrigkeit23%
Heizung14%
Funktionalität insgesamt13%
Wärme11%
Gesamtgröße9%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%
Haltbarkeit3%
Sprachprobleme3%
Hautgesundheit2%
Gelenkschmerzen1%