Skip to content
51

powerbank samsung s22

Worth a look

Shows sweet-spot pricing room ($14.35–$36.19), but a deep review moat (5,972 avg reviews) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 36Growth 46Conversion 40Competition 46Returns 72Price range 93Avg price 91Brand share 38Review moat 24Quality gap 63

Price range

Great€14.35–€36.19

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Great€21.51

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Good2.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+16.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Okay58%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Okay3.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay82%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay€175K

€175K/yr · 253K searches

Review moat

Bad5,971.96

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 58% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 rising

Sellers

115

Top-5 brand share

82%

Open market

14%

  • Samsung48%
  • INIU16%
  • Coblob7%
  • Feob6%
  • Anker4%
  • HETP3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (11 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€9K10%€17K15%€26K20%€35K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 24 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +16.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Aufladen30%

“Fast charging”

Qualität insgesamt12%

“Good Produkt”

Portabilität6%

“Super Powerbank”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Es funktioniert normal”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“super Investition”

Akkulaufzeit5%

“hat viel Power”

Stärke5%

“robust”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“alles bestens, handlicch, leicht zu bedienen”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Passt”

Kompaktheit2%

“Small und praktisch”

What buyers complain about

Aufladen30%

“it recharge very very slow”

Gewicht schwer11%

“Schwergewicht”

Haltbarkeit10%

“Bei der ersten Benutzung defekt”

Akkulaufzeit4%

“Enttäuscht von Power der Powerbank”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Bisschen globig”

Qualität insgesamt4%

“Do not buy this – it is bad quality”

Speicherkapazität2%

“0 Kapazität”

Funktionalität insgesamt2%

“Funktioniert nicht”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%

“Irreführend”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis1%

“Schade ums Geld”

Top return reasons

Gewicht schwer33%
Aufladen20%
Gesamtgröße20%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt5%
Funktionalität insgesamt4%
Defekt Material/Teile2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Produktzustand1%
Akkulaufzeit1%
Qualität insgesamt1%