Skip to content

hummingbird feeder base

Worth a look58/100

hummingbird feeder base shows demand growing +320.9%, but a small market ($50K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market/yr

$50K

Growth (1y)

+320.9%

Products

36

Brands

16

was 19 a year ago

Sellers

34

Price range

$6.64–$26.77

Returns

2.9%

Rating

3.9★

58/100

Worth a look

Scored 58/100 across market size, growth, competition, quality gap, and returns.

Market sizeGrowthCompetitionQuality gapReturns
Market size
2
×0.30
Growth
87
×0.30
Competition
72
×0.20
Quality gap
87
×0.10
Returns
77
×0.10

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 103 weeks — +320.9% year over year.
4K2KSpike '25Spike '26Jul '24Nov '24Mar '25Jul '25Nov '25Mar '26

Seasonality

Monthly demand index across the year — 1.00 is average.

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 12.3×

Competition

41%WOSIBO
  • WOSIBO41%
  • REZIPO14%
  • FIGEPO11%
  • Hortsun9%
  • HOLAHOMA5%
  • LemonRoad4%
  • Other (10 brands)17%

The top 5 products take 40% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them. 16 brands and 34 sellers compete here.

Brands

16 falling

was 19 a year ago

Sellers

34

Top 5 brand share

79%

#ProductBrandPriceRatingReviewsClick shareTrend
7WOSIBO$16.553.9★1195%rising

Product shelf

All 36 tracked products in this niche.

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall19%

“Quality feeder”

Size-Overall17%

“Exact fit”

Ease Of Cleaning13%

“Easy to clean”

Value For Money6%

“Worth every penny”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“As advertised”

Durability5%

“they didn't break either”

Leak-Proof4%

“Doesnt leak”

Ease Of Use3%

“Easy to use”

Strength3%

“Solid condition easy to use”

Design-Overall3%

“Nice design”

What buyers complain about

Leak-Proof40%

“THEY LEAK”

Size-Overall18%

“Does not fit”

Ease Of Cleaning4%

“Not a good design for cleaning”

Rusts/Corrodes3%

“unfortunately it is starting to RUST”

Pest/Insect Control3%

“Not bee proof”

Design-Overall3%

“POOR DESIGN, THEY LOOK LIKE CONVENTIONAL FEEDERS BUT THEY ARE A VERY CHEAP KNOCKOFF HENCE THE LOW PRICE”

Quality-Overall2%

“Poor Quality”

Value For Money2%

“Too expensive,”

Durability2%

“Plastic in glass peels after 1 use”

Functionality-Overall2%

“Now I can barely keep fluid in the the thing”

Top return reasons

  • Size-Overall67%
  • Leak-Proof11%
  • Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
  • Defective Material/Parts5%
  • Add-Ons/Attachments3%
  • Functionality-Overall2%
  • Material Quality1%
  • Mechanism Issues1%
  • Value For Money1%
  • Quality-Overall1%

Data scraped July 9, 2026 · Marketplace baseline: 4.4★ avg rating · $22.72 median price · 2.2% median returns across 14,725 tracked niches.