Skip to content

flip calendar for desk

Worth a look55/100

flip calendar for desk shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 24% of clicks), but a small market ($41K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market/yr

$41K

Growth (1y)

+244.8%

Products

72

Brands

47

was 62 a year ago

Sellers

93

Price range

$5.34–$22.80

Returns

1.5%

Rating

4.6★

55/100

Worth a look

Scored 55/100 across market size, growth, competition, quality gap, and returns.

Market sizeGrowthCompetitionQuality gapReturns
Market size
2
×0.30
Growth
81
×0.30
Competition
91
×0.20
Quality gap
31
×0.10
Returns
88
×0.10

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +244.8% year over year.
6K3KPrime Day '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26Jul '24Nov '24Mar '25Jul '25Nov '25Mar '26

Seasonality

Monthly demand index across the year — 1.00 is average.

Peak months: Jan, Aug, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.8×

Competition

12%ZICOTO
  • ZICOTO12%
  • MITREL8%
  • emmoolife5%
  • Stiamvd5%
  • EASEYA4%
  • DEERINE4%
  • Other (41 brands)62%

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (24% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen. 47 brands and 93 sellers compete here.

Brands

47 falling

was 62 a year ago

Sellers

93

Top 5 brand share

34%

#ProductBrandPriceRatingReviewsClick shareTrend

Product shelf

All 72 tracked products in this niche.

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall19%

“Convenient size”

Office Usability13%

“Great for office”

Quality-Overall11%

“The overall build quality feels solid”

Ease Of Use7%

“easy to write on”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“As advertised”

Document Organizing/Classification6%

“Keeps me organized”

Design-Overall5%

“Like the flip design”

Value For Money5%

“Great deal”

Strength4%

“Not flimsy”

Paper Quality3%

“Good quality paper”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall25%

“A lot bigger than I expected”

Quality-Overall7%

“the only option is to have another item resent which doesn't solve the low quality aspect”

Functionality-Overall6%

“Not functional”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Photo is Deceiving”

Color5%

“it is a dull gray”

Print Quality5%

“Print way to small”

Paper Quality4%

“makes the paper floppy”

Strength4%

“Little flimsy and the instructions could have been better”

Durability3%

“It falls apart whenever you touch it”

Value For Money3%

“Cheaply made for the price”

Top return reasons

  • Size-Overall65%
  • Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
  • Color3%
  • Quality-Overall3%
  • Functionality-Overall3%
  • Value For Money3%
  • Defective Material/Parts2%
  • Print Quality2%
  • Paper Quality2%
  • Material Quality1%

Data scraped July 9, 2026 · Marketplace baseline: 4.4★ avg rating · $22.65 median price · 2.2% median returns across 14,117 tracked niches.