Skip to content
54

toilet brush 2 pack

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.7%), but a small market ($89K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 22Growth 24Conversion 85Competition 65Returns 96Price range 54Avg price 60Brand share 70Review moat 45Quality gap 38

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great9.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good63%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good46%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Avg price

Good$13.25

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$3.44–$28.51

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,043.14

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-2.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$89K

$89K/yr · 70K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 46% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 falling

Sellers

106

Top-5 brand share

63%

Open market

31%

  • LIBMAN COMMERCIAL27%
  • AONEZ12%
  • SetSail9%
  • Holaloha8%
  • EZKEY7%
  • alpsnow5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$4K10%$9K15%$13K20%$18K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 28 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 79 weeks — -2.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KPrime Day '25Spike '25Spike '26JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money18%

“Great deal”

Quality-Overall16%

“They are of good quality and black”

Ease Of Cleaning10%

“Scrubs good”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“As described”

Ease Of Use5%

“Ease of Use”

Efficiency4%

“This brush works very well”

Assembly/Installation4%

“Very easy to assemble”

Strength4%

“It is strong enough for regular use”

Design-Overall4%

“slim design”

Durability3%

“Dont break”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall17%

“Not as great quality as I expected”

Size-Overall12%

“they are short”

Durability8%

“Broke easily”

Strength8%

“Doesn't feel sturdy”

Ease Of Cleaning5%

“awkward for cleaning”

Material Quality4%

“Would have wanted better material not plastic”

Rusts/Corrodes4%

“Rust very easily”

Value For Money4%

“I actually think it was priced too high at $8.99”

Functionality-Overall2%

“It does not work well at all”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“the description was not clear”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall33%
Quality-Overall13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Material Quality9%
Strength7%
Defective Material/Parts6%
Value For Money4%
Color3%
Assembly/Installation3%
Functionality-Overall2%