Skip to content
59

penis straws

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 20% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 45Growth 58Conversion 41Competition 95Returns 74Price range 36Avg price 74Brand share 54Review moat 91Quality gap 20

Competition

Incredible20%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Great175.64

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Good2.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Good$14.89

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Good+32.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Good73%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay$240K

$240K/yr · 489K searches

Conversion

Okay3.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Okay$2.74–$21.80

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (20% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

31 rising

Sellers

37

Top-5 brand share

73%

Open market

23%

  • OSTRIL30%
  • SAGNA19%
  • Hxezoc13%
  • Atiloy7%
  • BROSAG4%
  • xo, Fetti4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$5K4%$10K6%$14K8%$19K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)39 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 103 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +32.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
23K18KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall17%

“Good quality”

Strength14%

“They are sturdy”

Durability9%

“The quality is very nice and durable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“Looks just like the photo”

Color7%

“the color is pretty”

Size-Overall7%

“Perfect size, made well”

Gifting Purpose5%

“Great bridal shower gift”

Thickness4%

“hold up well even with thicker drinks like smoothies”

Design-Overall3%

“The designs are cute and sturdy, and they held up well throughout the night”

Material Quality3%

“good quality material”

What buyers complain about

Durability14%

“party era circle fell off very quickly”

Size-Overall11%

“Bigger than expected”

Ease Of Use9%

“I also find them a bit difficult to get liquid out of”

Quality-Overall8%

“they just looked so cheap”

Assembly/Installation6%

“Tangled Assembly”

Color Fading/Discoloration6%

“The color from the plates bled onto the food”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“Not as pictured”

Color6%

“Pinker than expected”

Mechanism Issues3%

“Slot of them don't grip well”

Grip3%

“Slot of them don't grip well”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall41%
Value For Money14%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Quality-Overall9%
Material Quality5%
Functionality-Overall4%
Color4%
Strength3%
Thin2%
Design-Overall2%