Skip to content
56

zum

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.7%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 73Growth 33Conversion 76Competition 62Returns 96Price range 86Avg price 85Brand share 0Review moat 37Quality gap 32

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great$11.39–$44.54

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Great$19.04

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great7.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good$802K

$802K/yr · 589K searches

Competition

Good48%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay2,761.82

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Okay+6.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 48% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

3 rising

Sellers

104

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Zum65%
  • Indigo Wild33%
  • Zum Speed2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$32K8%$64K12%$96K16%$128K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 28 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 67 weeks — +6.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KPrime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25AprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell64%

“Amazing Scent”

Quality-Overall7%

“Excellent product”

Ease Of Cleaning5%

“Great clean”

Soft Feel3%

“soft”

Cleansing2%

“I like the product it gives you a natural clean feeling”

Value For Money2%

“Worth the the money”

Ingredients-Overall1%

“Clean ingredients”

Durability1%

“Performance-wise, it genuinely holds its own”

Washability1%

“washes clothes good”

Moist/Dry1%

“Moisturizing and Smells Great”

What buyers complain about

Smell27%

“I dont like the smell”

Leak-Proof13%

“it arrived leaking and open”

Value For Money7%

“Waste of Money”

Ease Of Cleaning6%

“Didn't clean my clothes”

Dilute/Watery4%

“Nothing like the liquid”

Stain Resistance2%

“Leaves Detergent Stains”

Durability2%

“A bottle lasts just less than a week in my house”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“bought this believing those claims”

Allergies2%

“can cause hives 🥲 they didnt do it right away”

Texture/Consistency-Overall1%

“I was just disappointed with the texture”

Top return reasons

Smell51%
Leak-Proof29%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Value For Money2%
Color1%
Product Condition1%
Defective Material/Parts1%
Functionality-Overall1%
Dilute/Watery1%
Size-Overall1%