Skip to content
53

ylang-ylang essential oil

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.5%), but soft demand (-6.4% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 43Growth 22Conversion 83Competition 45Returns 84Price range 47Avg price 40Brand share 70Review moat 58Quality gap 52

Returns

Great1.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great9.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good63%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good1,184.96

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Okay$4.10–$24.48

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Okay58%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay$228K

$228K/yr · 233K searches

Avg price

Okay$10.74

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-6.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 58% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

20 rising

Sellers

521

Top-5 brand share

63%

Open market

30%

  • Cliganic16%
  • Majestic Pure16%
  • SU JUABA11%
  • HIQILI11%
  • Wuvezrub10%
  • EVOKE OCCU7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$9K8%$18K12%$27K16%$36K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 24 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -6.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KSpike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell62%

“The fragrance is great”

Quality-Overall13%

“The Best Quality Essential Oil”

Value For Money4%

“Great value”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Product as described”

Lubrication2%

“Nice oil”

Soothing Effect1%

“Calm”

Durability1%

“it's very long-lasting”

Ingredients-Overall1%

“My favorite of the essential oils”

Functionality-Overall1%

“Great items they work”

Suitability Combination Skin1%

“This has very good properties for the skin”

What buyers complain about

Smell59%

“Scent doesn't last very long”

Quality-Overall4%

“They are cheap/low quality oils at best”

Product Condition4%

“It was clearly used and returned”

Durability4%

“doesn't last long at all”

Dilute/Watery2%

“Also very watery”

Oily/Greasy2%

“This oil is adulterated”

Dispensing Mechanism2%

“The dispenser came broken”

Leak-Proof2%

“Leaky bottles”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Not what I am use to from other brands”

Bitter1%

“I bought another brand that smelt like a bitter version of Ylangylang”

Top return reasons

Smell78%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Leak-Proof3%
Size-Overall2%
Oily/Greasy1%
Product Condition1%
Value For Money1%
Vegan/Organic1%
Quality-Overall1%
Strength1%