Skip to content
55

vomit bags disposable

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but strong incumbent ratings (4.8★) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 96Growth 24Conversion 98Competition 31Returns 99Price range 60Avg price 53Brand share 42Review moat 27Quality gap 14

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible17.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Incredible$3.5M

$3.5M/yr · 1.6M searches

Price range

Good$5.69–$28.93

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Good$12.35

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Okay80%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay66%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay3,825

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-1.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.8★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

The top 5 products take 66% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 flat

Sellers

15

Top-5 brand share

80%

Open market

15%

  • MP MOZZPAK34%
  • CLOUDBERG18%
  • Hion14%
  • Valchoose8%
  • SUNMORI5%
  • PukeBag5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (8 brands, 15%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$176K10%$351K15%$527K20%$702K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 20 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -1.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
50K30KSpike '24Spike '25Holiday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use19%

“easy to take anywhere”

Portability12%

“They are very portable”

Quality-Overall11%

“Great quality bag”

Leak-Proof8%

“Never leaked”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“Is as advertised”

Value For Money7%

“Great Value”

Durability3%

“Durable and keeps a messy situation clean”

Efficiency3%

“work great for carsick kids”

Size-Overall3%

“These are perfect size”

Strength3%

“Sturdy bags”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall15%

“Small side”

Thickness10%

“Bags are not as thick”

Leak-Proof8%

“They leak”

Quality-Overall6%

“They are not the same quality as previous orders”

Smell4%

“Have a slight chemical smell when opened”

Ease Of Cleaning3%

“and the opening is extremely small which will make addition clean up”

Design-Overall2%

“However, I was disappointed in the size and design of the rim”

Ease Of Use2%

“awkward to use”

Cough Relief2%

“coughing stuff up”

Side Effects2%

“has a lot of vomiting”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall45%
Value For Money11%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Leak-Proof6%
Material Quality6%
Weight Heavy5%
Functionality-Overall4%
Thickness3%
Contamination3%
Strength2%