Skip to content
58

voltaren patch

Launch it

A $2.1M/yr market growing +30.1% this quarter with returns at 0.1% — clears our launch bar.

Market size 95Growth 56Conversion 99Competition 7Returns 100Price range 77Avg price 87Brand share 0Review moat 23Quality gap 47

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible18.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Incredible$2.1M

$2.1M/yr · 593K searches

Avg price

Great$19.82

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$5.52–$46.91

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+30.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad8,021.86

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad92%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 92% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

3 falling

Sellers

91

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Salonpas91%
  • Amazon Basic Care6%
  • Sumifun3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$215K20%$430K30%$644K40%$859K1K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 7 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +30.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency17%

“Does work”

Quality-Overall10%

“EXCELLENT PRODUCT”

Joint Pain9%

“Knee pain relief”

Value For Money8%

“They are affordable”

Adhesion/Stickiness7%

“Good adhesive”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“ITEM AS DESCRIBED”

Muscle Pain Relief5%

“Muscle Relief”

Ease Of Use5%

“EASE OF USE”

Ease Of Application4%

“They are cool upon application”

Size-Overall3%

“fits”

What buyers complain about

Adhesion/Stickiness25%

“Adhesive is not very good”

Pain Relief-Overall14%

“did not help pain”

Functionality-Overall11%

“Not effective”

Value For Money6%

“To expensive”

Smell6%

“Strong odor”

Ease Of Use3%

“hard to open”

Quality-Overall3%

“Not good quality”

Durability2%

“dont last”

Size-Overall2%

“Patches are smaller than I expected”

Strength2%

“Flimsy”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall28%
Functionality-Overall20%
Adhesion/Stickiness13%
Joint Pain12%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Pain Relief-Overall6%
Value For Money5%
Product Condition3%
Strength2%
Skin Health2%