Skip to content
53

vape

Worth a look

Shows beatable incumbent ratings (3.3★), but weak search conversion (0.3%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 53Growth 23Conversion 4Competition 38Returns 88Price range 83Avg price 90Brand share 48Review moat 66Quality gap 100

Quality gap

Incredible3.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great$21.02

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great$10.44–$39.71

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good847.9

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good$333K

$333K/yr · 5.3M searches

Brand share

Okay76%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay62%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-4.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

The top 5 products take 62% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 rising

Sellers

18

Top-5 brand share

76%

Open market

17%

  • VAPE VAC31%
  • VCase20%
  • Honeyrose10%
  • cigtrus8%
  • Quitz7%
  • MOXE6%
  • Open — no brand owns it (8 brands, 17%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$33K20%$67K30%$100K40%$133K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 20 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -4.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
125K75KHoliday '24Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use10%

“like to have one handy”

Smell8%

“Smells good”

Taste-Overall8%

“The taste was surprisingly smooth”

Quality-Overall8%

“the build quality is solid”

Value For Money7%

“it has a good value for money”

Flavor7%

“a mild flavor”

Efficiency5%

“They do the job”

Strength4%

“not flimsy at all which is great”

Portability3%

“easy to carry”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Works as advertised”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall16%

“Strong taste”

Value For Money15%

“Not worth the price”

Flavor8%

“Not a fan of the raspberry flavor”

Smell8%

“not so great for smell”

Functionality-Overall5%

“This device didn't help”

Quality-Overall4%

“Garbage”

Durability4%

“Do not last”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“NOT AS ADVERTISED”

Jamming/Clogging2%

“then it's clogged”

Strength2%

“So weak”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product18%
Functionality-Overall14%
Flavor13%
Smell12%
Taste-Overall9%
Breathability6%
Ingredients-Overall3%
Quality-Overall2%
Size-Overall2%
Filtration2%