Skip to content
56

teen tampons

Launch it

A $1.8M/yr market growing +24.0% this quarter with returns at 0.2% — clears our launch bar.

Market size 92Growth 52Conversion 99Competition 35Returns 99Price range 59Avg price 62Brand share 0Review moat 24Quality gap 16

Conversion

Incredible18.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Great$1.8M

$1.8M/yr · 717K searches

Avg price

Good$13.44

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$5.12–$29.32

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+24.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Okay64%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Bad6,259.83

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.8★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 64% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

5 rising

Sellers

111

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Tampax82%
  • Playtex9%
  • Kotex3%
  • Linzama3%
  • Pinkie, Inc.3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$182K20%$365K30%$547K40%$729K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 23 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +24.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
175K125KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jul, Aug, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 6.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money16%

“Great purchase for the price”

Quality-Overall15%

“Good quality”

Comfort-Overall11%

“So comfortable”

Ease Of Use9%

“Easy to use”

Leak-Proof9%

“Doesn't leak”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“As advertised”

Size-Overall6%

“They fit as expected”

Absorbency4%

“Absorbency is great”

Efficiency4%

“There great at doing the Dam job”

Ease Of Application3%

“the applicator is smooth”

What buyers complain about

Leak-Proof13%

“Dont prevent leaks”

Size-Overall10%

“Sizing is not accurate”

Value For Money10%

“100 pack is a better value tho”

Absorbency9%

“Absorbency is Limited”

Quality-Overall5%

“Definitely a quality control issue”

Pain Relief-Overall3%

“They burned me severely”

Color3%

“Packaging between regular/super is too close in color”

Thickness3%

“Man these are thick”

Unsustainable Design3%

“I really dont like the compact applicator design at all”

Ease Of Use3%

“Something about it just feels awkward compared to other options Ive used”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall27%
Absorbency12%
Value For Money10%
Certifications9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Leak-Proof6%
Compactness4%
Functionality-Overall4%
Product Condition3%
Contamination3%