Skip to content
47

tampons super plus

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 99% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 79Growth 22Conversion 100Competition 19Returns 99Price range 42Avg price 59Brand share 4Review moat 26Quality gap 20

Conversion

Incredible23.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Great$1.1M

$1.1M/yr · 359K searches

Avg price

Good$13.09

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Okay$7.27–$20.62

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay3,904.92

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-5.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Bad77%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad99%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 77% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

6 rising

Sellers

85

Top-5 brand share

99%

Open market

0%

  • Tampax71%
  • Playtex16%
  • Kotex7%
  • Cora3%
  • This is L.2%
  • LOLA1%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$110K20%$221K30%$331K40%$441K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 12 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 67 weeks — -5.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
8K6KPrime Day '25Spike '25AprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money14%

“worth the price”

Absorbency10%

“Great absorbency”

Quality-Overall10%

“the quality is consistent”

Vegan/Organic10%

“Organic Cotton”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“As described”

Leak-Proof7%

“Never leaked for me”

Comfort-Overall6%

“They are comfortable”

Ease Of Use6%

“easy to remove”

Ease Of Application5%

“Easy application”

Size-Overall5%

“Fits well”

What buyers complain about

Ease Of Use12%

“It is much harder to hold”

Functionality-Overall9%

“Ineffective”

Quality-Overall8%

“Poor performance”

Value For Money8%

“All these good things come at a higher cost”

Absorbency8%

“not absorbent at all”

Leak-Proof5%

“Leak, poor fit, just bad”

Size-Overall4%

“poor fit”

Grip3%

“So there is nothing to grip or help keep your hand/fingers in place”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Disingenuous marketing”

Comfort-Overall2%

“Very uncomfortable”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall33%
Advertised Vs Actual Product13%
Absorbency7%
Functionality-Overall7%
Leak-Proof5%
Material Quality5%
Product Condition4%
Value For Money4%
Moist/Dry3%
Ease Of Use3%