Skip to content
52

sugar blocker

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but a small market ($78K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 19Growth 19Conversion 45Competition 50Returns 99Price range 80Avg price 95Brand share 45Review moat 49Quality gap 82

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$33.07

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Great$7.70–$112.19

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Okay55%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay1,628.08

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Okay3.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay78%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Bad$78K

$78K/yr · 65K searches

Growth

Bad-11.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 55% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

15 rising

Sellers

377

Top-5 brand share

78%

Open market

19%

  • Pharmaganics52%
  • Dr. Stephanie's9%
  • Generic8%
  • Nature's Bounty5%
  • Life Extension3%
  • Irwin Naturals3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$8K20%$16K30%$23K40%$31K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -11.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K750Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall13%

“Nice taste”

Quality-Overall12%

“First, the quality is clear”

Blood Sugar Level9%

“Works really good keeping my sugar down”

Value For Money6%

“The price was very reasonable as well”

Weight Loss5%

“just weight loss”

Ingredients-Overall5%

“Great tasting and clean ingredients”

Vitamin4%

“I like the combination in this vitamin”

Side Effects4%

“enjoyed the effects”

Nutritional Content3%

“I also included a diet that helped”

Efficiency3%

“Very Effective”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall20%

“No results”

Value For Money10%

“Waste of money”

Blood Sugar Level9%

“no good for me increase my sugar”

Dosage8%

“The main reason for the average rating is that I simply didn't notice a significant difference while taking them”

Weight Loss4%

“It doesn't help weight or hunger so far”

Sweetness4%

“I dont eat sweets like that”

Nutritional Content3%

“I find that when I take these I just don't get hungry”

Side Effects3%

“headaches have become a constant”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Doesn't do what it claims”

Taste-Overall2%

“The taste isn't so great”

Top return reasons

Feet Fit29%
Size-Overall29%
Length14%
Comfort-Overall3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%
Color2%
Functionality-Overall2%
Width2%
Flavor2%
Warmth1%