Skip to content
55

stye eye compress

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (10.9% search→purchase), but a concentrated shelf (top 5 take 72% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 61Growth 34Conversion 91Competition 23Returns 88Price range 76Avg price 83Brand share 34Review moat 25Quality gap 68

Conversion

Great10.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Great1.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$18.02

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$9.35–$33.15

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good$519K

$519K/yr · 264K searches

Growth

Okay+6.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Okay85%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Bad4,462.86

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad72%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Competition

The top 5 products capture 72% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

11 rising

Sellers

31

Top-5 brand share

85%

Open market

11%

  • Stye27%
  • Bruder24%
  • myhalos23%
  • TearRestore6%
  • CorneaCare4%
  • Lure Essentials4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 11%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$52K20%$104K30%$156K40%$207K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 14 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +6.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Comfort-Overall16%

“Comfortable fit”

Quality-Overall12%

“Excellent Product”

Eye-Hygiene11%

“Helps my eyes”

Ease Of Use9%

“Easy to use and store”

Efficiency6%

“WORKS WELL”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“As described”

Value For Money4%

“reasonably priced”

Moist/Dry4%

“significantly less dry”

Heating Element3%

“Heats up quickly”

Size-Overall2%

“Very comfortable fit”

What buyers complain about

Heating20%

“Doesn't Retain Heat”

Durability7%

“Already broken”

Quality-Overall5%

“Cheaply made”

Value For Money4%

“They are expensive”

Smell4%

“chemical smell”

Functionality-Overall4%

“Does not work as described”

Size-Overall4%

“Not a good fit”

Moist/Dry4%

“All dried up”

Warmth3%

“Not very warm”

Weight Heavy2%

“Too heavy”

Top return reasons

Heating21%
Size-Overall15%
Advertised Vs Actual Product10%
Functionality-Overall9%
Comfort-Overall7%
Weight Heavy5%
Material Quality3%
Compression3%
Value For Money3%
Product Condition2%